Cooperation Under Pressure:behavior Patterns Of The Government In Rural Field

With the promotion of the rural revitalization strategy,the behavior of the government,especially the grass-roots government,has been highly concerned by the society.The behavior logic and pattern of the government in the rural field is a research hotspot.However,the change of the behavior logic and behavior pattern has received less attention at present and needs to be explained by more research.This paper takes the case of forest disputes in H District in the Pearl River Delta as the research object.On the basis of obtaining a large amount of first-hand information,it pays attention to the interactive process of the game between the government and the villagers in the rural field.This paper uses the case study method to conduct an in-depth analysis of behavior logic of the government and villagers so as to refine the effective behavior pattern of the government under strong pressure.The study found that the behavior logic of the government and villagers is influenced by the structure,capital and habits of the government organization field and the rural field.The government mainly follows the logic of "no accidents".After the failure of common means such as avoiding responsibility and expressing attitudes,the logic of leadership and interest promote the government to go deep into the countryside to solve problems and carry out long-term governance.Correspondingly,rational and irrational factors,profit-seeking and publicity together shape the behavior logic of the villagers.The interaction between the government and the villagers has promoted innovation of the behavior pattern of the government,which has not been fully explained by the avoidance theory yet.The effective behavior pattern of the government should be as follows: the public power should compulsorily correct the chaos and realize the reconstruction of order;integrate the economic capital,social capital and cultural capital;change the government’s negative habits and the rural habits.At present,the conclusions of this study are obtained from a single case so it can only be applied to resource-rich villages that are “rich first and then poor”,and the expansion of applicable boundaries needs to be summarized by the emergence of more cases.