Research On The Anti-poverty Effect Of The Rural Minimum Living Security System From The Perspective Of Multi-dimensional Poverty

At the end of 2020,my country won the battle against poverty as scheduled,the absolute poverty population in the country was completely eliminated,and the absolute poverty problem was solved historically.However,due to the low quality of poverty alleviation,the unstable foundation of poverty alleviation,and the impact of many risks such as disease,education,unemployment,natural disasters,etc.,the risk of some people who have been lifted out of poverty and marginalized people returning to poverty is still prominent.The problem of relative poverty and multidimensional poverty in rural areas has become a post-poverty alleviation The era is a major challenge for my country’s modern governance and sustainable development.As the core institutional arrangement in the rural anti-poverty strategy system,the rural subsistence allowance system is not only an important bottom-line policy arrangement in the new rural poverty alleviation strategy oriented by "targeted poverty alleviation",but will also continue to serve as a tool to alleviate rural relative poverty and multidimensional poverty in the future.long-term effective mechanism for the condition exists.Then under the new relative poverty and multidimensional poverty standards,can the rural subsistence allowance system reduce the poverty incidence of the rural population? Does the policy effectively play the anti-poverty role? The answers to these questions can not only enrich the theoretical research of policy evaluation,but also inspire the improvement of the national anti-poverty strategy and policy system.Based on this background,this paper first uses the literature analysis method to sort out the relevant researches on the poverty identification standard and the anti-poverty effect of the rural subsistence allowance system,defines the concepts related to the rural subsistence allowance system and multi-dimensional poverty,and discusses the theoretical basis of this article-feasible ability theory At the same time,based on the analysis of the impact mechanism of the rural subsistence allowance system and rural residents’ income poverty,health poverty and subjective welfare poverty,the theoretical assumptions of this paper are put forward,which further consolidates the theoretical foundation of this paper;The 2014 CFPS data,this paper uses the A-F double boundary method to analyze the dynamic trend of rural households’ single-dimensional poverty and multi-dimensional poverty;then,based on the CFPS 2014 cross-sectional data,this paper uses a binary Logit regression model to analyze the effect of rural subsistence allowances on income poverty.,health poverty,subjective welfare poverty and multi-dimensional poverty;finally,based on the panel data composed of cross-sectional data in 2012 and 2014,this paper uses the PSM-DID method to analyze the impact of the rural Dibao system on income poverty,health poverty,The anti-poverty effects of subjective welfare poverty and multidimensional poverty have been tested more rigorously.The regression results of binary Logit model based on single-period cross-sectional data show that obtaining rural subsistence allowances has a significant positive effect on income poverty,health poverty,subjective welfare poverty and multi-dimensional poverty.The PSM-DID empirical test results based on two-phase panel data further confirm the positive effect of the rural subsistence allowance system on single-dimensional poverty and multi-dimensional poverty.In terms of different regions,the rural households in the eastern and central regions who received the subsistence allowances were more likely to fall into multidimensional poverty than those who did not receive the subsistence allowances,while the impact on the rural households in the western regions was not significant.Based on the above research,this paper puts forward the following policy recommendations: improve the institutional system and strengthen institutional connection;improve relevant mechanisms to reduce targeting bias;strengthen employment incentives and reduce welfare dependence;standardize rescue behavior and inject ethical care.