Xinxiangxian Participation In Rural Governance:Structure,Authority And Function

From the traditional society to the new era,the rural elite has experienced three changes.First,from the economic and cultural elite in the traditional period to the political elite in the people’s commune period.The second is to become an economic elite during the period of reform and opening up.Third,in the new era,it will be transformed into the coexistence of multiple elites.Whenever,rural elites are always an important part of the operation of the village power system,maintaining the balance of rural society under the shaping of the state and grass-roots government.With the accelerated development of new urbanization and the rapid flow of urban and rural population,rural society is facing problems such as brain drain,the weakening of traditional endogenous authority and the differentiation of rural farmers.In this context,as rural elites in the new era,Xinxiangxian entered the rural field under the joint promotion of the government,society and individuals,and played a positive role in innovating the grass-roots governance system and promoting the integration of "three governance".China has a vast territory,and rural society has its particularity.In order to avoid "one side of a thousand villages",this paper analyzes the mechanism of Xinxiangxian participation in rural governance from the perspective of rural regional differences,and makes an in-depth exploration on the similarities and differences of Xinxiangxian participation in rural governance.Firstly,starting from historical,geographical and political factors,this paper analyzes the structural differences of Chinese villages,and discusses the causes and characteristics of unity villages,decentralized villages and split villages.Then,according to the idea of "what,why and how to do",this paper analyzes the typical cases of Yunfu,Shangyu and Ningjin three new township sages participating in the governance of township sages,and summarizes three new township sages participating mechanisms: cultural inheritance,economic development and coordinated governance.Then,it makes a comparative analysis of the three participation mechanisms.The study found that the three mechanisms have differences in Xinxiangxian structure,organizational form and governance performance.However,the operation of the three mechanisms has common internal logic and successful experience.Finally,this paper believes that under the background of rural revitalization,the participation of Xinxiangxian in rural governance may lead to the alienation of Xinxiangxian function,imperfect supervision mechanism and incentive mechanism and so on.Therefore,the state and society should continue to explore new forms for Xinxiangxian to participate in rural governance,strengthen institutional supply,improve institutional supporting facilities,and stimulate the endogenous driving force for the growth of Xinxiangxian.At present,the international situation continues to undergo profound and complex changes,and the task of domestic reform,development and stability is arduous and arduous.In this context,China should adhere to self-confidence in the road,theory,system and culture,constantly deepen reform,highlight the advantages of the national political system and governance system,and open up a new situation of "governance of China" !...