The standing committee of the people’s congress implements the system of filing and review of normative documents,which is an important supervisory authority given,and an important system to ensure the proper implementation of the constitution and law,and realize the rule of law.The government has always attached great importance to the work of the filing and review of normative documents,and has made a series of important arrangements to put forward to strengthen the system of filing and review on the aspect of constitutional implementation and supervision.However,as the constitution and law supervision system,The system of filing and review of normative documents has been implemented by the standing committee of local people’s congress for just over twenty years and is still in the development and exploration stage,which is not perfect.Therefore,it has become an important issue to get the correct supervision of normative documents to ensure that the constitution and law can be fully and effectively implemented in local areas.This article takes the implementation of the system of filing and review of normative documents of the standing committee of the L provincial people’s congress from 2018 to 2022 as the research object,and conducts empirical analysis on five main aspects of filing review:subject,scope,standard,mode,and procedure.This paper is divided into three chapters:In the first chapter,it trys to understand the statistics of the data of the standing committee of the L provincial people’s congress in the four years to the implementation of system of the filing and review of normative documents.With more informative data and information,it reflects the current operation of the system in the standing committee of provincial people’s congress and lays the foundation for the study.In the second chapter,the problems reflected by the research data are analyzed and summarized to show that there are still problems in the subject capacity,filing scope,review standards,review modes,and correction mechanism when implementing.On the basis of combing these problems,the causes are analyzed,including the scope of filing and review is narrow because the relevant provisions are lagging behind and cannot be effectively connected;the lack of operability of the appropriateness standard is mainly due to the lack of unified provisions on the principle of appropriateness;the review efficiency is low mainly because the review authority tends to communicate and consult the lack of rigid supervision,etc.In the third chapter,by focusing on the problems,it will reflect on the system design.The system of filing and review of normative documents is originated in China Native,different from the judicial review system of unconstitutionality in western countries,which needs to summarize practical experience as the support of its theoretical development.Therefore,This article aims to provide suggestions for the problems,which learns from the practical experience of the staff and the theoretical achievements of the academia,so as to further improve the system of filing and review of normative documents of the standing committee of local people’s congress. |