Research On The Realistic Dilemma And Countermeasures Of Network Ideology Governance In The New Era

Information flows without borders,and cyberspace has gunsmoke.Socialism with Chinese characteristics has entered a new era,the world is experiencing major changes unprecedented in a century,in the face of the treacherous international turbulence situation,complex and sensitive surrounding environment,China’s ideological field confrontation presents an unprecedented complex situation,the Internet has become the forefront of ideological struggle,network ideological governance can be described as a heavy task and a long way off.In order to answer well the examination papers of the era of network ideological governance in the new era,open a new situation in the change of network ideology,and occupy a high ground in the online ideological game,it is necessary not only to reveal the dilemma faced by network ideological governance from the dimension of theory,but also to build a solid security defense line of network ideology from the dimension of practice,and continuously promote the benign operation of network ideological governance,so that the Internet,the "largest variable",becomes the "largest increment" that condenses the overall strength,common concepts and common ideals of the Chinese nation.This study follows the principle of combining history and logic,theory and practice,and focuses on the theme of "the real-life dilemmas and countermeasures of network ideology governance in the new era",following the research line of "why → what →how → what to do",in order to answer the questions of connotation,basic basis,basic experience,real-life dilemmas and practical countermeasures of network ideology governance in the new era,so as to form a systematic understanding of the basic theory and application practice of network ideology governance in the new era,which are combined and supported by each other.The introduction section provides an overview of the origin and significance of the study,the ideas and methods of the study,the major difficulties and innovations of the study,and a literature review of the current status of domestic and international research on this study.Chapter 1,Academic Interpretation of Network Ideological Governance in the New Era.On the basis of analyzing and distinguishing core concepts such as ideology,network ideology,and network ideological governance,this chapter defines the connotation of network ideological governance in the new era,that is,this paper believes that "network ideological governance in the new era" refers to the leadership of the Communist Party of China,giving play to the synergy of multiple governance subjects such as government management,enterprise responsibility,social supervision,and netizen self-discipline,relying on a series of formal or informal means such as economy,law,and technology,with a purpose,a plan,and Organize the construction of online ideological positions,content construction,and the construction of the rule of law,refute erroneous ideas,resist value infiltration,and resolve public opinion crises,so as to realize practical activities that consolidate the guiding position of Marxism in the ideological field and safeguard the security of state ideology and political power.Network ideological governance in the new era is a multi-element,multi-level and panoramic system engineering,which is composed of six elements: governance subject,governance object,governance technology,governance method,governance mechanism and governance purpose.Chapter 2,The basic basis of network ideological governance in the new era.This chapter mainly discusses the theoretical,historical and practical basis of network ideological governance in the new era.In terms of theoretical basis,the relevant ideological resources such as the ideas of Marxist classic writers on ideology,the thoughts of the main leaders of the Communist Party of China on network ideology and the theory of socialist governance with Chinese characteristics were systematically sorted out.In terms of historical basis,this paper reviews and sorts out the historical process of the CPC’s in-depth development of Internet ideological governance since China officially connected to the Internet in 1994,inheriting historical traditions,summarizing historical experience,and grasping historical laws.In terms of practical basis,it systematically explains that network ideological governance in the new era is a realistic choice to effectively cope with the "two overall situations",a requirement of the times to enhance the cohesion and leading force of mainstream network ideology,a practical need to refute erroneous ideas and bad values in cyberspace,and an important guarantee for maintaining network ideological security and state power security.Chapter 3,Basic experience of online ideological governance in the new era.Since the new era,online ideological governance has continued to make new progress in theory and practice,winning a series of major battles in the field of online ideology and reversing the past situation of online chaos,fallen positions and passive defeat.The new era of online ideological governance has not only made great achievements,but also contains valuable experience that is scientifically instructive for the future,namely,adhering to the Party’s overall leadership of online ideological governance,grasping the leadership of online ideology,controlling the management of online ideology,and mastering the right to speak online ideology;adhering to the rational and beneficial online ideological struggle,and firmly establishing the will to fight online ideology,and We also insist on improving the institutional system in the field of network ideology,consolidating the fundamental system in the field of network ideology,clarifying the system of responsibility for network ideological work,and improving the working mechanism of network ideological governance.Chapter 4,The real-life dilemmas of network ideology governance in the new era.This chapter discusses four major dilemmas in the governance of online ideology in the new era: first,"algorithmic recommendations" are separated from "mainstream values","information cocoon" obscures the objective presentation of mainstream values,"audience orientation" crowds out the space for the dissemination of mainstream values,"gate-keeping" disrupts the cohesive effect of mainstream values,and "technological alienation" disrupts the cohesive effect of mainstream values.The "information cocoon" obscures the objective presentation of mainstream values,the "audience orientation" crowds out the space for the dissemination of mainstream values,the "gate-keeping transfer" disrupts the cohesive effect of mainstream values,and the "technological alienation" induces the absence of rational mainstream values.Secondly,"capital logic" and "safety and justice" deviated from each other,and the "vulgarity and curiosity" to attract attention under the capital scheme kept eliminating the spiritual situation of netizens,and the "will of the platform" to decenter under the hostage of capital.The "will of the platform" to challenge the authority of mainstream ideology,the "wrong trend of thinking" to endanger national ideological security under capital infiltration,and the "opinion leaders" to deliberately discredit online public opinion under capital manipulation.Third,the "charisma of flow" competes with "content determination",and content production fetishizes "flow authority",resulting in the proliferation of distorted information and content dissemination.The "flow supremacy" has led to the lack of value orientation and the decline of in-depth thinking due to the "flow ranking" of content browsing;fourthly,the "extra-legal territory" and Fourthly,the game between "extralegal" and "good governance according to the law",the lagging process of online legislation has led to "passive follow-up",the blurred authority and responsibility of online law enforcement has led to "nine dragons ruling the water",and the escalation of online judicial disputes has led to "chaos".The "chaotic situation" and the weak awareness of law-abiding among netizens have led to "disorderly words and actions".Chapter 5,Exploring countermeasures for network ideology governance in the new era.This chapter proposes five countermeasures to address the practical dilemma of network ideology governance in the new era: First,to create a comprehensive network governance pattern of multi-faceted governance,to play a leading role of the Party and government,to compact the responsibility of network platforms,to open up social supervision channels,and to actively advocate self-discipline of netizens;second,to promote the transformation of positive energy content into large traffic,to optimize the supply structure of network information content,to innovate the expression of network information content,and to improve the effectiveness of network Thirdly,to shape the balance between value rationality and tool rationality,optimize algorithm design to break"algorithm neutrality",disclose algorithm data to avoid "algorithm abuse",strengthen algorithm supervision to regulate "algorithm The fourth is to adhere to the people’s position in unifying the logic of capital,regulating the structural ratio of capital in cyberspace,preventing the disorderly expansion of capital in cyberspace,improving the policy of access to capital in cyberspace,and promoting the construction of capital for good in cyberspace;the fifth is to promote the rule of law in cyber Fifth,promote the rule of law in network ideology governance,establish a complete system of rule of law regulation for network ideology governance,an efficient system of rule of law implementation for network ideology governance,a strict system of rule of law supervision for network ideology governance,and a strong system of rule of law guarantee for network ideology governance.