Study On The Governance Of Rural Contradictions And Disputes From The Perspective Of Social Governance Community

As an important category of rural governance,the effective governance of rural contradictions and disputes is the meaning of rural revitalization.Promoting the governance of rural contradictions and disputes and building a social governance pattern of co-construction,co-governance and sharing has become a hot topic of rural governance at present.Although some regions have achieved quite rich practical governance results in the process of rural revitalization,various types of contradictions and disputes brought by the inflow of interests into villages still exist and show different realistic characteristics,which seriously affects the improvement of the modernization level of rural governance system and governance capacity.In the critical period,promoting the effective governance of rural conflicts and disputes is an urgent practical task in consolidating and expanding the achievements of poverty alleviation and promoting the process of rural revitalization.In view of the governance of rural contradictions and disputes,the current mainstream view believes that it is necessary to conduct in-depth research on the subject behavior and practical logic of the governance of rural contradictions and disputes,and then explore the important governance ideas and practical governance strategies of rural contradictions and disputes,which has important practical objective and value for the governance of rural contradictions and disputes and even promote the process of rural revitalization.From the perspective of research content,this study takes the social governance community as the perspective,adopts the case study method,takes the contradiction and dispute governance practice of D Town in Hubei Province as the specific case,discusses the role of multiple governance subjects in rural society,and how to strengthen their consultation and co-governance behavior through corresponding governance behaviors,so as to realize the effective governance of rural contradictions and disputes.In the practice process of rural conflict and dispute governance,D town has successfully constructed the "1+1+3" working mode according to the social governance goal of "building a strong team,optimizing a platform and forming three working mechanisms." Under the design of this model,each governance body plays its own functions and roles,such as the guidance of grass-roots party organizations,the leadership of township governments,the promotion of village-level organizations,the coordination of social forces and the return of villagers to the participation standard of governance subjects.In the interactive process of consultation and co-governance,a pattern of co-governance of rural contradictions and disputes is formed.Jointly participate in the resolution of rural contradictions and disputes,forming a new situation of rural governance.Therefore,the conclusion of this study takes the governance experience of D Town as the research basis,providing an important basis and reference direction for constructing the governance logic of rural contradictions and disputes.Therefore,based on the practical experience of D Town in the governance of contradictions and disputes,this study explores the practical opportunity for multiple governance subjects to participate in the governance of rural contradictions and disputes,and constructs the corresponding logical operation framework,so as to analyze the specific operation logic of rural contradictions and disputes.That is,it attempts to deconstruct the governance logic of rural contradictions and disputes from the choice of the three strategies of "organizational mobilization led by rural party building","contextual discourse of township government governance" and "mechanism supply of multi-subject consultation and co-governance",which work together in the governance of rural contradictions and disputes.Its contents include two aspects: on the one hand,it should coordinate the interest demands of villagers based on the social governance centers at the township and village levels;On the other hand,it is necessary to pay attention to the role and behavior of multiple governance subjects and the role of consultation and co-governance.Therefore,based on the perspective of social governance community,this study extends and puts forward the "three commonalities" path to achieve effective governance of rural contradictions and disputes,that is,to build a governance path of "incremental co-construction-consultation co-governance-achievement sharing," so as to provide some reference for improving rural governance capacity.The conclusion of this study is that the change of the role of the government has highlighted the governance role of multiple subjects in rural contradictions and disputes.In the governance of rural contradictions and disputes,multiple subjects should not only strengthen the consultation and interaction between each other,but also give full play to the positive role of the governance mechanism of rural contradictions and disputes,define the rural "social governance community" through the consultation and co-governance of multiple subjects,and promote the effective governance of rural contradictions and disputes.