| Colleges and universities are one of the important forces for scientists cultivating,scientific production,and scientific and technological innovation.The evaluation of the scientific research capabilities of colleges and universities,especially the impact of scientific research achievements,has always been an important research topic.With the rise of online publishing,open access and online academic communication,profound changes have taken place in the way of knowledge dissemination and academic communication,which has provided a large amount of available data for improving the influence evaluation of universities.On the other hand,the value orientation that“Double First-Rate” construction aims to serve economic and social development is increasingly emphasized,and the influence evaluation of university achievements is of great significance.Therefore,it is not only an objective trend but also a realistic requirement to accurately measure the influence of scientific research.In the quantitative evaluation of the institution,indicators like the number of publications and the citations are often used in the evaluation of institution from the side.These indicators have limitations in the application of influence evaluation.The generation of Altmetrics and the application of scientific collaboration indicators provide new perspectives for influence evaluation.This paper analyzes the composition of influence of scientific research output based on its own attributes and institutional attributes.Then,based on the the process of scientific collaboration,the publication,the dissemination of research output on media,and use of research output,this paper integrates traditional Bibliometric indicators,Altmetrics indicators,and institutional collaboration indicators,to build a evaluation model of papers influence of universities from four dimensions: academic productivity,utilization influence,communication influence,and collaboration influence.This paper takes the papers published by 42 " Double First-Rate " universities in China as the basic dataset,and obtains the raw data through document retrieval and API.Taking Economics as the representative domain of the Humanities and Social Sciences,and Organic Chemistry as the representative domain of the Natural Sciences,within the framework of the theoretical model,the evaluation indicators that are suitable for the specific domain are determined.In addition,taking Economics as an example,the weights determined by AHP method,Entropy Weight method and the Combined Weighting method are brought into TOPSIS to evaluate the universities.By comparing the evaluation effects of different weighting methods,it is found that the application of Entropy Weight-TOPSIS method in the field of Economics can achieve relatively satisfactory evaluation results,and the evaluation results are proved to be reasonable.Then,the paper uses the evaluation model to carry out further analysis.According to the indicator scores,the cluster analysis was carried out on the universities in the fields of Economics and Organic Chemistry,and the distribution and correlation of influence is analyzed.The results show that the level of scientific research production and scientific research communication,and the relationship between the two,make the influence distribution of universities appear different characteristics,and the results provide a reference for universities to improve the influence of paper output.Finally,the two representative domains,Economics and Organic Chemistry,were compared to explore the differences in the index weight and evaluation results of the evaluation model in different disciplines. |
PDF Full Text Request