| Purpose:Whether the scoring standard is reasonable and scientific directly affects the fairness of the physical education examination.Based on the continuous big data of students’ physical fitness for many years,the regional changes of students’ physical fitness are analyzed,the characteristics of students and the physical education examination of the students.Method:This study mainly uses mathematical statistics method and map analysis method to analyze the physical fitness(physical quality)of 13-15 students aged 1985-2014,the original scoring standard of a Hebei city and the results obtained by the standard,adopts the progressive scoring method,establish a new scoring standard,and test the original sports examination results.Finding:(1)There are obvious regional differences and urban and rural physical quality of junior middle school students aged 13-15 in different provinces in China,and this difference exists for a long time.(2)There are problems in the current scoring standards.The scoring criteria of the physical education examination test items in a city in Hebei Province do not meet the progressive principle,and in the same score section,the examinee with the high original score gets the same score,which also violates the scoring principle of sports competition.Through the KS test,combined with the results of kurtosis,skewness and schematic method(histogram),it was found that all the grades did not conform to the normal distribution,and the proportion of full marks and failure was too high,and there are significant differences between men and women.(3)The results under the new standard are in line with the normal distribution,the proportion of excellent and failing grades is basically in line with the expectations,and there is no gender difference in the same items.Conclusion and suggestion:Conclusion:(1)There are obvious regional differences and urban and rural differences in the physical quality of junior high school students aged 13-15 in China,and this difference exists for a long time.(2)The original scoring standard of the physical education examination test items in a city in Hebei Province cannot meet the requirements of the current physical education examination,and it is unreasonable.(3)The new scoring standard formulated according to the progressive scoring meets the basic principles of sports performance evaluation,and can be used as a method to formulate the scoring standard for the physical education entrance examination.Suggestions:(1)Due to the various results caused by different regions,there are obvious differences in students ’physical fitness,and different regions should formulate the scoring standards according to the differences in students’ physical fitness.(2)There are big problems in the current scoring standard of the physical education examination.With the change of the policy,the sports examination score increases year by year,the importance of the sports score is self-evident,the current sports standards can not achieve the purpose of the physical education examination,it is suggested that the original scoring standard should be further revised and improved.(3)The evaluation of sports performance should conform to the basic law of the improvement of sports performance,and the progressive scoring standard can basically meet the requirements of the physical education examination,which can be used as the basis for the formulation of the physical education examination scoring standard.Only from the perspective of revising and improving the scoring standard,this paper discusses the feasibility of progressive scoring in making the scoring standard of the sports examination,and plays a little role in promoting the reform and improvement of the current sports examination. |