Study On The Analysis Of Physics Test Questions In Chinese Examinations

The state has issued documents such as "Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Education System and Mechanism",pointing out that curriculum standards are an important basis for teaching and proposing questions.And the Chinese examination paper is an effective means to test students’ learning.Studying the consistency between the 10-year Chinese examination physics test questions and the curriculum standards in Liupanshui City,where I interned,is of great significance to enrich the theory and guide the practice for the author to deeply cognize the curriculum standards and improve the teaching level of secondary school physics.Translated with Deep LUsing Liupanshui 2013-2022 Chinese physics examination papers as samples,the literature research method,content analysis method,and statistical analysis method were used to analyze and study the question types,question sizes,and scores of 10 years of Chinese physics examination questions.The SEC model was used as the main research model to build a 5×5 matrix.The created matrices were assigned and coded to the curriculum standards and the Chinese examination questions to obtain the corresponding ratio matrices.A framework was created to study the consistency of the Liupanshui Chinese examination paper with the physics curriculum standards.An exhaustive study was conducted mainly on two aspects: cognitive level and content topics,and finally the p-values were calculated to analyze the consistency between the two.Translated with Deep L Conclusion of the study:The results of consistency between the Liupanshui 2013-2022 Chinese examination physics paper and the physics curriculum standard(2011 version)were not satisfactory,with p-values fluctuating up and down between 0.4664 and 0.7543,compared to the statistical significance reference value of 0.780,indicating that the two do not have significant consistency.Knowledge content theme,the examination paper is more on the "motion and force","electricity and magnetism" two parts of the examination,for "matter","sound and light","electricity and magnetism" less examination,and less consistent with the requirements of the curriculum.Among the cognitive requirements,the examination of "understanding" and "practice" is higher than the requirements of the curriculum standards,while the examination of "understanding","understanding",and "application" is lower than the requirements.Research recommendations:Based on the P-value,we analyzed the reasons for the consistency of the Liupanshui physics midterm exam paper with the curriculum,which was generally poor,and then proposed some suggestions for improvement related to teaching and questioning.