Font Size: a A A

Multi-measurement Evaluation Method And Application On Government Performance Based On People's Livelihood

Posted on:2011-09-17Degree:DoctorType:Dissertation
Country:ChinaCandidate:Z P LuFull Text:PDF
GTID:1116330338995702Subject:Management Science and Engineering
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Performance evaluation is the most important guarantee to construct the serving government with nomocracy, efficiency and translucent. The problems of government performance evaluation are analyzed based on the theories of performance evaluation abroad. The theory system of performance evaluation grounded on livelihood perspective is discussed on the background of certain area in Nanking. The innovation is as follows:(1) The government performance evaluation index system with people's livelihood direction is constructed based on government performance evaluation management pattern, which includes four first index people's livelihood, economy level and quality, political civilization level and spiritual civilization level. Then, the power solving model is constructed using three endpoints interval linguistic matrix theory and the rationality of outcome is discussed.(2) Assessment of government performance with the complexity and uncertainty, assessment of the knowledge structure with differences of preferences has led to different structure of the main uncertainties of different preference information. Range is based on the logical consistency of uncertainty to determine methods of preference. Analysis of a number of types of uncertainty in the mechanism of preference ranking is done and proposed an integrated five preferred model with uncertainty. Streets in an area are taken as an example to assess the performance of the steps described Methods.(3) As the assessment were evaluated for varying degrees of familiar objects, the difference in level of knowledge, the ambiguity of human thinking and limitations and so on, certain issues may be difficult to make fair and appropriate assessment, which formed under incomplete information Government performance assessment. Established the value of missing elements inferred model, it is based on incomplete complementary method to determine the decision-making matrix. DEA is an improved assessment of government performance. Decision-making unit interval is divided into a number of variables sub-interval, the establishment of the sub-interval on the efficiency of decision-making unit of the DEA model the value of the assembly in order to achieve all of the DMU for the purpose of the full order.(4)Government Performance assessment is that during a certain period of government, political work and the general ability test. Assessment process should be comprehensive, linked the issue of the campaign point of view. Real-time information concerning the Government's due diligence of the party and government work, performance is outstanding, whether official corruption situation, in a dynamic assessment of the formation of the Government's basic conclusions. Assessment process is the formation of different phases of the uncertainty of multiple preferences, different weights of decision-makers to identify the model, consistency groups to identify the views of the right to re-stage model and determine the model with time-series characteristics of the establishment of the multi-stage form of many types or structure integrated model of preference uncertainty.(5)Performance assessment against the Government of the people's livelihood concept reflected the problem of inadequate methods, using the gray system theory. Perspective based on the livelihood of the people in the Government Performance evaluation of Bayesian network model. Evaluation from the perspective of government departments, people's livelihood quantitative performance analysis tools is done. Given incomplete information based on the quantitative method to assess government performance. It can deal with incomplete information better when the issue of government performance appraisal. (6)The ultimate aim of performance evaluation is to seek ways to improve performance. The establishment of a weight under the conditions of uncertain multi-attribute evaluation model is done. Evaluations of subjects improve their own competitive advantages and reduce the advantages of vision in the dual objective of competitors. Through fair competition to obtain the weight of the model used in a certain district, Nanjing City Government is applied to do optimization of performance improvement. To some extent, the performance improvement program is to ensure scientific and impartiality.
Keywords/Search Tags:government performance, comprehensive evaluation, dynamic, Bayesian network, performance improvement
PDF Full Text Request
Related items