From 1990s, modern philosophy pays much attention to the questions of global development, and development philosophy has moved from Dependence Theory and New Concept of Development to Globalization Direction. The questions of justice become more and more prominent as globalization quickens its steps. Man's development today has raised not only the questions of justice in sustainable development: the injustice to nature development, to the development of other people at his time, and to the development of his offspring; and the questions of justice in the unbalanced development between rich nations and poor ones: rich nations plunder poor ones and the gap between the rich and the poor is wider and wider; but also the questions of justice in global development under economic and political hegemony: hegemonic theories believe hegemonic nations are beneficial to global stabilization and development, is it true? No, even though hegemonic nations are beneficial to stabilization, it is still unjust to those nations under the threat of hegemony. The questions of the world's unbalanced development, economic and political hegemony, and sustainable development urgently need justice theories of global development in practice. However, the new liberalism justice theories presently popular in the west are unjust to the development of developing countries, especially socialist countries. This paper has followed the theoretical route of Marxist justice thought, further studied the justice theories in Marxism, criticized the modern western hegemonic development theories and the new liberalism justice theories, provided theoretical instructions to developing countries' just development and our country's socialist modernization.This paper has fallen into three parts: the introduction and conclusion as part one, the second chapter as part two. and the third chapter as part three. The introduction includes three sections: the first section is about the values of questions-respectively analyzing the theoretical and practical values of global development justice; the second section introduces the present situation of the field of study-respectively summing up the justice thoughts of Chinese, western, and Marxist scholars; the thirdsection presents the research methods, writing frames, main and new ideas of this paper.Part two argues about the notions of global development justice. It has three sections: section one, justice-the difference between justice and righteousness, meaning of justice, patterns of justice, and the relationship between justice and efficiency: section two. global justice-meaning of global justice, how can there be global justice, and the relationship between global justice and liberty and equality; section three, global development justice-meaning of global development justice, global development justice versus duty and obligation, and global development justice and right versus duty.Part three investigates principles of global development justice and makes comments on them. This part has four sections: section one. principles of and comments on global development subjects, including non-single subject principle-criticism of traditional views of development, non-subject principle-criticism of postmodern views of development, and subject-object -subject principle-globalization communication practice's views of development; section two, principles of and comments on global development rights, including non-hegemonic principle-criticism of hegemonism development theories, non-harm principle-criticism of liberalism development theories, and reciprocity principle-new development concepts of equal rights and duties; section three, principles of and comments on global development opportunities, including concepts-just equality of global development opportunities, basic opportunities of global development-complete equality, and non-basic opportunities of global development-proportional equality; section four, principles of and comments on global development results, including contribution principle-econ... |