The Research Of Incentive And Implement Of Government Reformation Based On Institution Change Theory

The relationship between government and market economics has always been a central concern, especially since the 1980s of the 20th century. New Public Management movement in surging around the world, public sector reform theory to be challenged again. As the transition of developing countries, China is undergoing a comprehensive reform, a comprehensive round of changes and restructuring. And involves economic, political, social, cultural and other fields, the transformation of government departments are no exception. China's transformation of the government has its own characteristics, but compared with China's economic reform, government restructuring is relatively backward, Despite the urgent requirements, But the transformation of government into the path of reform and transformation of government functions is not in place cyclical expansion of the "double jeopardy" by. Changes in the system of government as part of the restructuring, Comparing with the changing economic theories to explain the transition of the system is also lagging behind.This paper is based on the relative theory and practical challenges imperfect The motivation to study and implement mechanisms for the transformation of the government as the main objectives of the restructuring of the system reveals the government's attempt to change internal rules. lay the foundation for the further theoretical study and look forward to the government's decision to provide a theoretical basis for an effective transition. The issue of changing the system of government as the demand Perspective for analysis. First theoretical framework changes to the current system, the institution change induced institutional change and the mandatory application of the theoretical limitations of starting. Complementary to the external, internal and structural and systematic theory for the foundation, This system is divided into governmental organizations and governmental organizations outside the system and change the system and its changes. Changes in the organization of the government system logic In less developed countries in transition, and reveal the existence of the paradox institution change within government organizations, thus the transformation of the government into the theoretical framework.Organization System Change that the government solve the paradox lies in the difference in preference government actors, then implemented a system based on theoretical ideas, Pareto a change in the system of government is the key actors in perspective, describing the behavior of its features Changes in the system and the causes of the core functions and bound. embedded in the government system so as to the role of the North's system to change the model. Subsequently, the analysis of institutional change within the government as a driving force. Governmental organizations within the system to change as a basic point of view of public goods, external to the logic of public infrastructure. Discussion interference in the free-rider problem, the system can be effectively and fully change issues. Economic players as clients outside the government, the government as an agent of the government reform policy makers, authorized agent model was used to explain the common type, asymmetric information and information symmetry in the circumstances, politicians and entrepreneurs and the degree of institution change occur, governmental organizations which have been the driving mechanisms for changing the system model.Then, analysis of governmental organizations that encourage the implementation of the institution change in the internal mechanism. To the government bureaucracy based on the characteristics of bureaucratic failures as the logical starting point, As a result of a bureaucratic system of the five path-dependent. Use the results of the analysis in Chapter III, politicians within the authority of encouraging students to the relationship between politicians and bureaucrats. politicians and bureaucrats and defines the function of the proceeds. Bureaucratic reform as a representative sample of good exposition whether restructuring. whether the closure was a bad incentive model to explore the use of a politician in incentive compensation reform and decentralization of choice, and the reform of the bureaucracy is really acceptable options.Finally, on the basis of logical analysis. Western New Public Management movement and the government conducted a certain amount of analysis of the facts in transition. Discusses the reality of reform and change the system from outside governmental organizations within the system to change the course of evolution. Analysis of the New Zealand public sector reform within the external impetus, its success has been due to external forces driving the formation of a joint force, the authority to be effective in protecting politicians. reform of the lower bound. And an institutional reform to the two cases shows that the resistance to institutional reform is key to the success of the system and complete information. mandatory use of authority combined with an effective reform of compensation. The restructuring of the government in view of reality, based on the conclusions of this study to find a breakthrough in the reform. nurturing social capital and establish a compensation mechanism to strengthen long-term supervision, deepen the proposal.Among the innovative work :First, for the transformation of the government to explain the basic framework - the government institution change within the framework of analysis. Address the shortcomings of existing theories, to the structural analysis of the existing government reform analysis of the difficulties of making a new explanation -- the politicians and bureaucrats' acts goal difference. Institution change to the role and function levels as a basis for defining and re-demarcation of the institution change the way government organizations and organizations outside the government institution change the model, pointing out the differences between the two links. And described as a non-Pareto change of government restructuring, the reaction is a negative internal and the external-changing, embodies the system of non-equilibrium and balanced system of conflict, thus remove the interpretation of the government to reform the role because of the hardships caused by the cycle of conflict demonstrated the difficulties, also made the original "government-market" analysis paradigm into "politician-entrepreneur-bureaucratic" paradigm.Second, the government established a institution change within the mechanism driving model. Description of the leading reform - the concept of the system, its exposition of inevitability, and governmental organizations within the institution change the key actors in the roles, thus the role of politicians within the Health of the government restructuring model. Pointed out in efficiency-oriented governmental organizations within the institution change, the public right politicians' incentive is particularly important. Construction of the more than one entrepreneur of the government institution change within the agency authorized common type model that the politicians entrepreneurs reform demands of a rational individual and collective rationality conflict caused by several Game results been in the information symmetric, asymmetric information of the Nash equilibrium solution, This would explain the reason for the transformation of the government lagging behind the external causes.Third, the government established a institution change within the implementation mechanism model. In-depth internal government bureaucracy and the system of structural analysis of the basic ideas, Description of the bureaucracy led to the structural features of the five path-dependent effect and the "effective bureaucracy budget maximization" and "bureaucrats and politicians survival time difference" perspective. Construction of the cost of reform binding, the government restructuring politicians of the bureaucratic incentive mechanism model. Analysis of the information fully and incomplete information circumstances, the "good body" and "bad body" how to take the separation of powers and incentive compensation for the two parties to achieve the greatest benefits. China's government restructuring process, due to asymmetrical information, consider the cost of reform bound politicians must give bureaucratic different incentives. Therefore our government transition process is an asymptotic process, and encourage efforts to grasp the incentive is whether the key to success. Only by continuously attempt to get hold of the best incentives, and thereby achieve closure "bad organ" Reorganization "good institutions", which explains the transformation of the internal reasons for delay.