Font Size: a A A

Study On The Impact Of Public Fiscal Support In Cultural Industry In China

Posted on:2017-10-25Degree:DoctorType:Dissertation
Country:ChinaCandidate:L ZhouFull Text:PDF
GTID:1365330485467898Subject:Industrial Economics
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Under the multiple function of the market demand pull,culture and technology integration,social capital participation and government financial support,the cultural industry in China starts from the start-up stage to the growth stage,which highlights the potential for growth as the pillar industry of national economy.But from the point of the international situation,the trend of economic globalization is increasingly strengthened,the advantage of cultural industry in the developed countries bring strong impact to China's cultural market.China's cultural industry shows competitive situation with weak against strong in the aspect of economic aggregate,industrial structure,cultural trade and so on,which facing widespread invasion and infiltration of the cultural industry in the developed countries.These factors not only affect the development of cultural industry,but also fundamentally endanger our country's cultural security.Therefore,we need to use the power of the government,to search the best path of financial support,optimize the fiscal policy choices,speed up to accelerate the development of cultural industry,and realize the strategic goal of the construction of socialist culture power as soon as possible.It is a key step to clarify economic effect of the financial support from the cultural industry development in China.This article makes research on the inference mechanism between financial support and the cultural industry development,in order to optmimize the mode of financial support to guide the development of cultural industry,fully released the huge economic effect and social effect.It not only has important theoretical value to the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure,but also has important practical significance to guide cultural industry policy adjustment of related departments.From the perspective of theory,both of the public goods attribute of cultural products and the cultural productivity spiritual attributes of cultural industry,called on the government intervention of cultural industry development.While fiscal policy tools is the government important means to guide and support the development of cultural industry.The fundamental goal of fiscal intervention is to solve market failure and make up for the efficiency loss of market mechanism.However,the government mechanism also makes efficiency loss in the link just like the tax collection and administration,the financial fund allocation and use,so the financial investment of cultural industry has the optimal scale.At the same time,based on the different stages of the cultural industry life cycle,financial support mode should be significantly different;based on the different types of public product attributes in cultural industry internal,fiscal support effect has obvious difference.Combined with theoretical analysis,this article measures synthetically the economic and social effect caused by the fiscal investment of the cultural industry in our country from the perspective of empirical analysis.First of all,using the GRA principle,we make the overall quantitative analysis of the financial support effect of the cultural industry from the national and provincial level respectively,and measure the whole correlation sort,in turn,is the effect of economic growth,industrial scale effect,spillover effect and employment effect.It shows that fiscal spending on cultural industry in our country at present stage haven't reached the optimal scale yet,it is a better way to increase financial input to give full play to the economic and social effect of the cultural industry.Secondly,from the perspective of government spending,according to the theory model of government expenditure and public cultural expenditure,we measure the influence factors of public cultural expenditure in our country using the cointegration theory.The results show that the culture spending restricted by factors such as economy,prices,policies and politics.And for now,our country has subjective and objective conditions to enhance public cultural spending.Then,from the perspective of cultural industry development,according to the correlation sort results,deeply analyze the inference mechanism between financial support and the cultural industry development,and empirically test.Finally,aimed at restricting factors in the process of developing the cultural industry,design scientific and effective financial support policy to support and guide the cultural industry development.In this paper,the research results show that:First,financial input of the cultural industry has dual economic effect on the cultural industry development and regional economic growth.On the one hand,the financial input,the capital input and the labor input are the three main factors which has positive role in promoting cultural industry development.The contribution of financial input to the cultural industry scale expansion is four times the size of the capital input,and the contribution of labor input is the smallest.Compared to cultural supply,the promoting function of cultural consumption is bigger,and the financial input in the region should be more inclined to improve residents' culture consumption ability.Fiscal decentralization has certain inhibition of cultural industry development,while cultural policy vigorously promoted the development of cultural industry.On the other hand,cultural financial investment and cultural capital investment promote the regional economic growth,while cultural labor input inhibited the growth to a certain extent.Cultural consumption expansion significantly contributed to the economic growth,of which the influence of the urban cultural consumption is greater than the rural cultural consumption;the effect of cultural supply on economic growth is twofold,of which the cultural heritage has a weak positive effect on economic growth,and the cultural market supply has a tiny restriction effect on economic growth.The performance of cultural expenditure reflects the obvious structural imbalance.Second,financial input of the cultural industry has employment pull effect.One is from the overall perspective of cultural industry,financial support,education levels and public cultural services have a positive influence on the cultural industry employment,but the industry average wage is affected by many factors such as economic growth,education levels and financial support.From the internal structure perspective,financial support and cultural participation have positive influence on those four industry employment including the performing arts,popular culture,libraries and museums.Among them,the contribution rate of the financial support on the performing arts industry and popular culture industry employment is obviously larger;the improvement of labor productivity inhibits the industry employment to a certain extent.From the regional difference perspective,the contribution rate of financial input to the western region employment is the biggest,the contribution rate of fixed assets investment and education level to the western region employment is the biggest;the cultural industry development in the central region appears weak position in the region competition,and it has not formed the benign interaction mechanism yet.Third,financial investment of the cultural industry has spatial spillover effect.First of all,from the national perspective,financial input has significant spatial spillover effects to the provincial cultural industry development.Provincial cultural industry development in our country not only depends on its own industrial development foundation and financial support factors,but also depends on the adjacent provincial cultural industry development foundation and financial support.That is to say,financial support for the development of cultural industry got expanded role by spatial spillover effects.Secondly,from the regional perspective,spatial spillover effect of the cultural industry shows the gradient spillover effect among the three belts including eastern,central and western areas,rather than the spatial spillover effects at these regions inside.The spillover effects reflect obvious regional differences,which the development of cultural industry in the central region present vicious competition,the east and west cultural industry get to realize the coordinated development.Third,from the perspective of development stage,the cultural industry development of our country is still in the capital driven phase.Financial support,own funds and financial credit are three core variables to promote the industry development,and the synthetical effects of the financial investment is strongest among them.In conclusion,for the design and implementation of financial input mechanism in cultural industry,on the one hand,it is to improve the correlation of fiscal policy variables and economic development,and contribute to the smooth operation of multiplier mechanism;on the other hand,we need to adjust the financial investment from dependence on total amount control,to focus on the internal structure optimization.We should pay more attention to the guiding role of cultural industry policy,to making the financial investment to play a bigger role in promoting the cultural industry development,long-term economic growth,employment absorption capacity enhance and absorption of spatial spillover effects.
Keywords/Search Tags:Cultural Industry, Public Financial Support, Economic Growth Effect, Employment Pull Effect, Spatial Spillover Effects
PDF Full Text Request
Related items