| The focus of this study is a philosophical inquiry into the following question: should the performance of sacred music be included in the public school music curriculum? This dissertation analyzes significant issues for music education that emerge from case law related to the performance of sacred music, and constructs a robust and comprehensive justification for the use of sacred music in the public school curriculum that accounts for the legal and philosophical complexities inherent within the problem. The case of Nurre v. Whitehead, 587 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2009), brings attention to issues surrounding the use of instrumental music with sacred connotations and student rights to musical expression. In analyzing this case I address defining the nature of the "sacred", rights to free musical expression, and the role of administrative oversight in curriculum decisions. An analysis of Bauchman v. West High School, 132 F.3d 542 (10th Cir. 1997) focuses on contextual and coersive considerations in the performance of sacred vocal music. Specific issues center on the use of music with a religious text, instructional and performance context, and the issue of coercion. An investigation into Stratechuk v. Board of Education, South Orange-Maplewood School District, 587 F.3d 597 (3rd Cir. 2009) examines issues relating to the performance of holiday music and the professional responsibilities of music educators. The analysis discusses the differences between performance and classroom study, the particulars of holiday music as a subgenre of religious music, and professional responsibilities of music educators. Conclusions suggest that while sacred music can and should be studied in the public schools, music teachers must exercise professional care and discernment in constructing a balanced music curriculum. |
