| Grass-root governance is an important part of national governance and the modernization of grass-root governance is related to the realization of the overall goal of national governance modernization.Under the background of the modernization of grassroots governance,it is of great significance to study the governance capacity of the grassroots government.However,the problem of lack of governance capacity of grassroots governments is widespread in the current grassroots governance practice,which is concentrated embodied in the lack of resources,imbalance of power and responsibility and Incentive failure.As a result,various governance problems can not be solved in time and effectively,which seriously restricts the realization of the goal of good governance at grassroots level and the orderly promotion of modernization of grassroots governance.In this regard,how to enhance the governance capacity of the grass-roots government,to improve the status of grass-roots governance and the efficiency of grass-roots governance,and then to promote the modernization of grass-roots governance has become an important practical proposition facing grass-roots governance.This study takes "governance capacity of grassroots government" as the research object,and selects Local governance theory,Holistic governance theory and Inter-government relations theory to provide important methodological basis and theoretical analysis tools.On the basis of the above theoretical resources and extensive field investigation,chooses the extended case method to conduct literature analysis,empirical analysis and normative analysis on the governance capacity of grass-roots governments,and use the perspective of the block relationship to explain the governance ability of the grass-roots government.Establish an analytical framework of " Tiao Kuai Relationship——the governance capacity of the grassroots government",and analyzes the Tiao Kuai Relationship from “resource-power-incentive” dimensions,so as to study the governance proposition of the grassroots government governance capacity.Combined with the case of Pinggu District,Beijing,this paper focuses on the current governance situation of the grassroots government,and analyzes the dilemma of governance capacity of the grassroots government from the perspective of Tiao Kuai Relationship.Resource dislocation,imbalance of power and responsibility and incentive failure are the current situation of the current Tiao Kuai Relationship,which also restrict the governance ability of the grass-roots government and make them into multiple dilemmas such as law enforcement,development,service and management.In this regard,based on the in-depth analysis of Pinggu’s experience,this paper proposes to explore the path and mechanism of improving the governance ability of the grassroots government from the perspective of reconstructing the Tiaokuai Relationship of the grassroots government.To be specific,the reconstruction of the Tiaokuai Relationship of the grassroots government can be realized by three mechanisms: resource devolution,balance of power and responsibility and incentive optimization.Resource devolution can solve the resource shortage dilemma of the grassroots governments by enhancing the human,financial,functional and policy resources of grassroots governments.The balance of power and responsibility solves the dilemma of "small power but big responsibility" by strengthening the overall power of the grassroots government.The incentive assessment rebuilds the Tiaokuai Relationship of the grassroots government from the perspective of incentives,which ensures that resources devolution and the balance of power and responsibility are implemented in place,and transforms the reconstruction of Tiaokuai Relationship of the grassroots government from institutional norms to governance practices.In short,through the mechanism innovation of resources,rights and responsibilities,and incentives,the Tiaokuai Relationship of the grass-root government has changed from being unbalanced to being balanced.And the resource integration ability,overall scheduling ability and collaborative governance ability of the grass-root government have been improved accordingly,thus enhancing the ability of the grass-roots government to solve problems.According to the above analysis,conclusions are as follows: First,the lack of resources,the imbalance of power and responsibility,and the failure of incentives constitute the three constraints to improve the governance capacity of grassroots governments;Second,the reconstruction of the Tiaokuai relationship of the grass-root government based on resource devolution,balance of power and responsibility and incentive optimization is an effective way to improve the governance capacity of grass-roots governments.Third,the improvement of grassroots government governance capacity can improve grassroots governance dilemma and promote "good governance" at the grassroots level;Fourthly,the innovation of grassroots governance mechanism oriented to solve the dilemma of grassroots governance is conducive to promoting the modernization of grassroots governance.On this basis,in order to improve the governance capacity of grassroots governments and promote the modernization of grassroots governance,the following policy suggestions are put forward: First,to deepen the role of CPC building guidance in grassroots governance,and to convert the political and organizational advantages of CPC to advantages of the grassroots governance;Second,to strengthen the coordination power of the grass-roots government,and to realize the matching of the power and responsibility of the grass-roots government,so as to achieve the effective integration of the key forces of grass-roots governance;Third,to establish a list system for community-level governance issues,to form a complete community-level governance chain with "problem discovery","problem solving" and "problem assessment" as the core links,and to improve the governance efficiency of community-level governments.Fourth,to expand the space for institutional innovation at the grassroots level,to encourage local governments to explore various institutional innovations in light of local conditions,and to make institutional innovation an important means of effective governance at the grassroots level. |