The Comparison Study Between Taiping Historic Block And Jinggang Historic Town In Changsha

In the rapidly developing days today, there is two opposite sides : One is standing on the historical angle, criticize the development destructing to historical fragment, and emphasize protection and inheritance; the other side whose topic is development reconsiders that too much protection would fetter developing, and claims to break through the tradition.For judging, it is inevitably refer to several questions below: Why does the historic fragment to be protected? What to be protected? How to protect? Basically on the three questions ,for the study of Taiping Historic Block and Jinggang Historic Town ,the author defines them as the fragments inside and outside of the city ,with the relations unified but discriminating , for the comparison study , then tries to answer several real questions as following:Why do the fragments inside and outside of the city to be compared?How about their living conditions? And what is the protected content? How do them play their respective roles in the city? What is the difference between their target for developing? How about their respective principle of plan? What is the difference between their design technique and method? How to deal with renew and protect?With these research questions, the author takes Taiping Historic Block and Jinggang Historic Town in Changsha as the example for comparison researching, and sum up the"durable element", the author takes the view of discriminating history as theory basis , with the demand of crowd and the social, to make sure their respective roles in the city: Taiping Historic Block is a recording of the resident's vicissitude life in the city , for the city life; Jinggang Historic Town is holding on the scene of 1930's , for opening space touring.The author claims that Taiping Historic Block, the plan target is displaying regional culture charming, improving the aborigin's living condition, satisfying diversity life of the resident in the city, providing an interested place which can represent the city, holding memory for offspring; For renaissance, the plan target of Jinggang Historic Town is for economy through opening tour, for reappearing the charming of the town, for creative protection and continuing the tradition of south town and folk custom circumstances. Because of common character ,for protecting the tradition in the two, the author claims such similar plan principles as"protect history","abiding the tendency of itself","sustainable developing"and"harmonious society".But actually also has the different principle of correspondence in view of two"the development":"dynamic developing"and"reappearance of the scene","symbiosing with city"and"symbiosing with nature","fostering business with residence"and"fostering residence with business","gradually-in-order developing"and"fresh true".From plan implementation and method angle, then proposed: Stress"renewal"the Taiping Historic Block should use"the new old union","to newly makes up newly", from"microscopic"obtains the implementation plan which, proceeds in an orderly way; Stress"protection"Jinggang Historic town , then should"repair old as before", begins from"the scene", implementation plan.Finally, the author proposes the following viewpoint to the historical fragment protection and the renewal: (1) Stand out of the historic fragment itself limitation visual ,exploring broader viewpoint for considering; (2) Emphasize relative value of historical fragment in specially space and place; (3) Keep"the durable element"of historical fragment, abiding the view of discriminating history; (4) The application of comparison method aims at cognizing the dialectical relation between renewal and protection, not blindly following any other kind theory and method , is sustainable protecting.