A Study On Coping Style, Trait Of Mental Health, And Their Relationship Of Low Income College Students

In recent years, China implemented gradually reform the higher education system, the tuition fees for college students to gradually from public funds at their own expense, so that the family economic difficulties students face new problems. Poor college health account for 26 percent of the poor students and the corresponding phenomenon of mental health issues has been growing for the community and college attention. Many studies show that the choice of coping styles and psychological health of the individual is significantly related. Lazarus early in the 1960s found that the problem-oriented health and psychological response were related (Compas, 1988; Lazarus and Folkman, 1986). Most earlier studies abroad to adults or college students were tested, and involve research on a wide range on college students coping with the physical, psychological and healthy relations also have extensive and in-depth study. Domestic research a late start, but related studies have shown that individual coping styles and the relationship between physical and mental health. Dry ginger gold (1993), and others of that negative coping with the mental health association. Mr Lau new (2001) study shows that the planning, such as the initiative and forced restraint was significantly negatively correlated with forced emotional venting is positively correlated.This paper attempts to explore college students cope with poverty, mental health and its relationship to low income college students to provide mental health and the basis for reference.Based on the purpose of selection of Jinan University's students as suitable samples taken randomly selected for a total of four grades from 406 college students, 398 valid questionnaires were recovered, 98% efficiency, 93 low income students, 305 non-low income students. Xiao Jihua's Coping Questionnaire (CSS) and the spirit of symptom checklist (SCL-90) class units collective Measurement. VFP6.0 scale use of imported data will be followed by its introduction and spss11.5 data management and statistical analysis; major statistical methods: t-test, analysis of variance and regression analysis.The results show that:(1) In the low income college students to solve the problem of the way the scores were significantly lower than those of non- low income students ,and in the self-condemned was significantly higher than that of the non-low income students; low income college student s in the SCL-90 body, forced, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, paranoia, psychosis, and so on eight the factor scores were significantly higher than the non- low income college students, the low income college students in general mental health level was significantly lower than the non-low income students.(2) Low income students scored in dealing with boys in the way of solving problems, was significantly lower than that of girls, and in the SCL-90 forced, depression, hostility, paranoia factor, low income students of boys scored significantly lower than girls.Freshman low income students in dealing with the problems on the score was significantly lower than sophomore, junior and senior low income students, and the self-condemned, was significantly higher than that of sophomore, junior and senior poor students; senior low income students SCL-90 in the interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety, hostility, paranoia and mental illness, as well as scores were significantly higher than those on the junior poor students, and obsessive-compulsive disorder in the sophomore and senior poor students were significantly higher than those freshman students , on the whole, a senior health poverty level of the mental health was significantly lower than the other three-year low income poverty students.Low income college students in the one-child fantasy factor in coping styles scored significantly higher than non-only-child; in the SCL-90 scale the body of the one-child factor scores were significantly lower than those of non-only-child.Students from city in the SCL-90 on the body of the factor scores were significantly higher than those from the rural poor college students.(3) Coping style self-condemned, requests for assistance and fantasy factor and the low income college students related to the overall level of mental health reached a significant level of fantasy, mental health assistance for the return of significant effect.