On The Performance Evaluation Of Grass-roots Government

In China, the government performance evaluation start later, there is still a long distance with developed countries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and analyze the performance of government advantages and problems, Performance Evaluation of grassroots government to explore the strategies and performance assessment for government reference in the development of our country.The reason for the grass-roots government performance assessment was based on the following four reasons. First, the theoretical study of the performance evaluation is a blank check according to the data indicates that our governments always have a macro performance assessment studies, and it always discussed with the national evaluation system assessment of the management system and other issues, from the grassroots, the government has little significance. Second, in our county (including county) there is a large number of grass-roots governments. Only for formed the government, following county (including county, the same below) and the number of grassroots governments are 129 times more than the city and the provincial government. After the state's major policies should county government following the implementation of the grassroots people can really reach the masses, on the government performance assessment. If the research is shortage, then easily out of China's national conditions. The third is grass-roots government to directly face the broad masses of the people, whether scientific administration of the people's vital interests. Therefore, the strengthening of grass-roots government performance evaluation, and improve the government's administrative level, more conducive to safeguarding the interests of the broad masses. Fourth, I work at the grass-roots as an ordinary civil servant. Always felt a real grass-roots pressure and difficulties faced by the government. All understanding of the scientific assessment of the grass-roots government will guide the government's grassroots administrative acts effectively based on scientific concept of development and building a harmonious society above the national strategy.My text is divided into three parts.The first part of the government performance assessment from the three areas outlined. First, start from the definition of achievement, and explained the concept of government performance evaluation. Secondly, the government introduced performance evaluation of the developments in the international and domestic situation, Western countries; government performance evaluation can be traced back to World War II before the first practice. Its development process generally has gone through three phases: First, the initial stage, to the 20th century, the 1940s to the 1970s. The second period was a large-scale development phase, the time from the 1970s to 1990s. The third period is standardized deepening stage time from the 20th century since the 1990s. In China, the Chinese government is still in the initial stage of the development of performance evaluation due to late start. Our country's theory on the performance evaluation started in the 20th century, around the mid-1990s. Third, introduce about the Chinese government performance assessment theoretical results.The second part takes the Tonghua City County as an example; show the performance assessment of the advantages and problems of the grassroots government. First, the performance assessment of grassroots governments one of the features of the earlier practices of grassroots government performance evaluation. Second, a wide range of performance evaluation forms to co-exist. Three indicators are very specific detail. The next part is to assess the performance advantages of grass-roots government. Primary jurisdictions of the government are smaller, easier to command and control advantages; Management is relatively low, is easy to establish indicators to assess the advantages Closer ties with the masses. Easy to play with the advantage of the results of the assessment guide; the impact was relatively small, with assessments difficult to adjust, and improve the competitive edge. Third, that the grass-roots government performance assessment, and explained the causes of the problems. First, the assessment of the operation there is disorderly; Second, the leadership of the government performance assessment enough attention to the issue; Third, it is not a scientific evaluation. The fourth is to use the results of the assessment arbitrary manner, the problem of poor sexual orientation. The cause of the problem, mainly because the cadres and masses in the following points : First, the idea is still very backward; Second, innovation policy-makers lack the will and the energy of innovation; Third is the need to reform and improve the existing taxation system; Fourth, it is far from academic research institutions, the lack of scientific guidance.The third part, take out three government performance evaluation of County Road operating strategy to the Tonghua City. First, the assessment of the main selection strategy including five representatives of district-level first deputies, CPPCC members. Congress is the function of supervising the government, the functions of the CPPCC are to participate, the assessors said, NPC deputies and CPPCC members is indispensable. Second, the government departments lead cadres of the qualifications. They engaged in public management for many years, is rich in grass-roots work experience and their experience is an asset in itself. Third, the leadership of the Organization Department of the regional party committee in the weight of heavy hearts cadres in the whole region. Only the results of the assessment can make effective use of performance appraisal is effectively implemented, and the Organization Department of cadres -- the results of the assessment will be combined. Fourth, experts and scholars engaged as a consultant because at the grassroots level lack of access to new knowledge, new theories talent only experts can be sure of a more scientific assessment of the operation. Five representatives of various levels; through questionnaires, visits and other forms of performance assessment that the government allow them to participate. Secondly, the system of evaluation proposed strategy. County Road and make government performance indicators divided into two parts, with one part on township streets of assessment indicators. The target is part of the government departments. These indicators covering the township Street and the entire work of the government departments will constitute the system. Thirdly, the assessment built management system strategy. First, the establishment of the assessment team led by the direct leadership of the regional party committee, comprising Director of the Office of the Minister of the Organization Department...