Font Size: a A A

Analysis On The Institutional Vicissitude Of Countryside Governance

Posted on:2009-07-26Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:H Y FuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2166360242970189Subject:Administrative Management
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Governance is not only a new form of the contemporary government management, but also a product of the administrative reform. Different from the traditionally defined management, a good governance is a process of social management to maximize the public interests for the public affairs. Its intrinsic characteristic lies in the cooperative management of government and citizens in the public affairs. Then, the traditional government management is in the transition of a good and wise governance.China has had a traditional factor of self-government since ancient times. Long before in the times of clan society, China had the regulation of "the whole world as one community", "select the worthy and promote the capable" and the mechanism of "election" and "dismission". The clan members could exercise their rights to participate in the clan society management. Up to the early feudal society, xiangli system was developed, then baojia system, and then the people's commune system after the founding of the People's Republic of China. These typical systems embodied the factors of self-government. Up to the early 1980's, rural autonomy in the true meaning was seized. With the publication of "Organizational laws of rural committee" and the penetration of the ideas of "grass root democracy", rural autonomy was more and more paid attention to by the society. In essence, rural autonomy is a democratically administrative mode in which the country integrated and reorganized the rural resources, that is to let the village people run their own . affairs. This kind of democratic administration is called "township government, village administration" mode.Rural autonomy is formed in the certain social background, and deducted in the special rural areas. In the process of the system change, there is an interests fight between interests gainer and interests potential gainer, which evolves into the multiple ways of game playing in the reality between the different interests subjects and different organizational forms. In the different stages and different conditions, the function and the outcomes of the game playing varies. Look back on the passing more then twenty years in the course of the change, it is obvious that the origin, carrying out and development of rural autonomy are no more than the rivalry with each other, interaction, outcome and game playing of the multiples of different strength. At the same time, it is the game playing that promotes the exploration and innovation of the rural democracy system.
Keywords/Search Tags:Villagers' Self-government, Institution, Rural governance
PDF Full Text Request
Related items