Comparative Study Of Party Politics In Transition Countries

In the middle of 70s 20th century, the wave of democratization began in Southern Europe has swept Latin America and the East Asia region's authoritarian regimes, and promoted the establishment and development of democracy in these areas. Keep up with it,in the late 1980s and early 1990s drastic changes happened in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, and it completely subvert the socialist political system in these countries, the Western parliamentary system and a multiparty system was built instead. At the end of the 1970s in 20th century, China began to reform in economic system, and then in the early 1990s political system reform comprehensively pushed forward. These regions or countries were referred to as transition areas or transition countries because of their political system or the political style changes. But due to the differences in the specific environment,the transitions in different countries showed their diversity. The comparative study on the countries in transition become the main content of study on transition.Central Eastern European countries and China have attracted more widespread attention because of the same background and the different transformation models. Central Eastern European countries adopted the Western multi-party parliamentary democracy after the transition, and China's reform of the political style refer to the development of inner-party democracy, the changes in the lead style of the Communist Party of China,the improvement in its ability to govern and improvement and development in China's CPC-led multi-party cooperation and political consultation system. In Central Eastern Europe and China, the choice of political parties mode was affected by many factors, and the two political parties modes have their respective characteristics in the internal organizational structure of political parties,the relationship between the political parties, the relationship in the political parties and state organs.Such characteristics played a different role in promoting the establishment and consolidation of political democracy.The first part of this paper is Introduction, detailed of the topics reasons, research status,the basic theory, the framework and research methodology.And in the topic reasons,the countries in comparison were defined. The next four parts mainly chose a few variables to start the comparative analyses. The second part is the comparison in starting point of the two modes.The two political organizations has similar problems in the structure and function, the state power structure and participation in politics there are three similar issues, which constitutes a common starting point for restructuring of the two. The third part was mainly on the social environment which impacted the transition of the two parts,including the economic environment, cultural environment, and the international environment. Part IV analy political parties from the individual and the micro perspective. Specifically, including the members of a political party and their behavior, organizational structure and the functions of a political party, Organizational program and objectives. At the same time it analysed their different roles in promoting the political democracy. Part V analysed the similarities and differences in the relationship of political parties and the relationship between political parties and state organs from a macro point of the political system, including the relationship between political parties and the organs of state power, the political parties and the state administrative organs, political parties and the the judicial organs of the state.At the same time,it also refered the role it played in the power constraints and democracy.