Action Logic On The Interest Expression Of The Contemporary Chinese Farmers

At present,China is undergoing a profound and historical process of transformation from an agricultural society to an industrial society,and the changes of social structure and the adjustment of benefit pattern have brought the huge influence to the countryside.The Popular Resistant Accidents is the prominent manifest and the extreme performance of kinds contradiction,the friction and the conflict between kinds of benefit subject in the rural society. These events are important manifestations of the conflict in transition society,in a way that it reflects the interests of the community integration and social order situation.The popular resistant accidents reflected the general case on the grounds of specific or non-specific most of the people involved in collective action.Farmer participation in collective action is the main motive to express their interests to the Government and the community interests, through its own actions to arouse more attention to the upper with a view to protecting their own interests,change their own situation.Reform improves the awareness of the main benefits of farmers,but farmers are not given enough benefits to institutionalize effective expression of space.This article holds that,most of peasant collective action is based on the expression of the benefits,The vast majority of cases it is caused by the interests of peasant groups caused damage.So here peasant collective action is mainly targeted at the expression on benefits.When the peasant interests are jeopardized,why not take the formal institutional arrangements for channels? Why select group case reflected an informal way of expression, rather than a formal expression of Choice? This is a question worthy of study.Because it directly relates to the logic of group behavior.This article is from of the perspective of the interests of the expression,attempts to superficial analysis of contemporary China for peasant groups behavior.As an attempt,the author research collectice by means of positive research and process event.The article is based on the survey mengcun done for the case study.Information in this article,most of them come from the author of the personnel involved in the case investigation. In addition,the author also investigates the neighboring villagers,as well as knowledge of the case of the other villagers.In the survey,the author mainly uses an in-depth interviews and observation of laws and the collection of case related with some text information.Process-the analysis of case research strategy is a dynamic analysis,it can take care of that in the process of case complexity and interactivity,and can demonstrate the process of collective action in some of the key mechanisms and processes.Therefore,in order to be able to vividly process to restore the original appearance of the whole case.In this article,the author will adopt a "storytelling" approach,a more detailed description of the evolution of the situation of peasant action,aimed at the scene through the display and process event to "reproduce" farmers throughout the course of action.To express their interest demands mengcun villagers sustained action for several years,and it is the largest number Participants in Z region since the liberation,with the longest case of mass collective action.This article is based on the mengcun survey done for the case studies,aims to mengcun cases as the center,discussion of contemporary Chinese Farmer expressed interest group logic of action.mengcun up to five years for collective action,this paper attempts to answer the following questions:Why peasant collective action in this way to express the aspirations of benefits? How it is produced? Why it can be sustained so long? Farmer selection of action of the logic behind it?From mengcun this case,the Farmer Health and the root causes of grievances is the denial of benefits,which makes Mengcun villagers have valid reasons for action,in which case,ignore the more grass-roots cadres and attention,but more among the villagers passion for justice.Such longer the problem,but also the more villagers will be more involved in collective action.At expressing the interests of mengcun the villagers,the one they begin to go within the system are moderate route;then,select a pressure action - collective petition trouble;Finally,toward the "confrontational" actions.Why the villagers to rise to the expression and sustained action from the gradual accumulation of discontent,collective identity formation,the emergence of elite action and the mobilization of these three aspects of analysis and interpretation.Their actions are with the existing system and its values are consistent,not anti-institutional,anti-social.In fact,the whole course of action,the villagers have been our conviction that high-level government and the country as an important third-party give them a solution to the problem one day.Even then,the villagers adopted a confrontational violence of action,nor does it have the purpose of their anti-social nature,but rather seeks to arouse the government attach great importance,does not have any political purpose.The main purpose of their action is to be able to through the benefits of this unique way of expression to protect themselves are subject to varying degrees against the interests of the hope that action can rapidly and directly to change their situation unbearable.In this regard it is the expression of the general group behavior are the basic characteristics-that is, participants agreed that by virtue of the power of groups can change the current status.Their goals are limited,it is hoped that their problems can be just and equitable solution.If the expression of the channels within the system be able to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of farmers,they would not select the non-institutionalized means,nor will it go the way of violent extremism.The research has discovered the phenomenon that the strong bulty the weak and the powe-money transactions are more likely to evoke powerful reactions among farmer groups and also have stronger mobilization potential.Collective sense of common destiny of the collective logic in the rural areas makes this dense network of cultural relations to replace the individual logic.The collective action models make their own choice of action on the basis of norms and the mold resources framework they have regulated.Familiar,high-density social networks,making collective action participants and free-riders can be said to be highly visible. Are the combined effects of several factors,that led to it lasted for so long.In addition,from the development process of the mengcun case,We can see that the majority of group ai-defense case is available in nature.It often has a development process of intensification. Most of the case are "small trailers big".Farmers through the normal channels and channel to reflect problems and fight for the interests of the demands of the question,turned a deaf ear, can be resolved,the settlement do not give timely settlement and deal with,or conduct against Farmer suppression blindly.So that the common people miserable,unbearable,and only take the "trouble" approach to express their aspirations,so that the escalation caused by the higher level of attention and the attention of the Government to fight for their own interests.Thus formed a situation of "No trouble is not solved,the small settlement of a small downtown,a scene big solution".By mengcun case,we can see that the interests of peasant groups of expressing the vast majority of cases are because of the interests of farmers caused by damage.It is a peasant groups in the interests of damage but failed to find a suitable solution to the situation,express their dissatisfaction with the will and a way of sel-rescue.At present,the benefits of peasant groups expressing Chinese society in transition are different between the main benefits of an objective performance of the conflict,we should not shy away from these practical problems, we should not undermine it at every turn will be linked to social stability.We do not how to use the powerful to suppress the perpetrators,but should seek to establish an effective mechanism to express benefits and consultative mechanisms in order to ease social confrontation,to avoid escalation of the conflict.Therefore,currently we do is a rational view of the interests of peasant groups to express action,the benefits have been open channel of expression,and to broaden the interests of a wide range of questions to resolve channels.The goal of public governance is good governance,The Government persist in taking economic construction as center,should assume the responsibility of maintaining social equity.Only really respect and protect the rights of vulnerable groups in order to realize the harmonious development of society.Of course,because of lack of personal skills,there are still inadequacies in the theory and methodology.