During The Transition Period Between The Government And The Social Organization Of The Asymmetry In The Development And Analysis

Social organization is funded by the citizens, for members of the common ideal, in accordance with its internal activities, articles of Association in order to achieve the Organization's aims and objectives of the not-for-profit community groups. From this definition are evident, a typical social organization must have the following characteristics,â‘ social organization must be composed of civil society, on a voluntary basis and not through coercion forms;â‘¡a typical social organization must have its own purpose and mission, only those who have similar views and common ideal of people together, in order to achieve some goals together, that we may become a social organization.â‘¢non-profit, members form a community-based organizations in order to achieve the purpose of the Organization and mission.Before the reform and opening up the social organization and the Government essentially the former to the latter completely dependent,therefore, social organizations lack full validity. But in the current transition period, social organization and the Government is essentially a dual asymmetric relations of cooperation. Its major manifestations in:"big government, small society". The Government social dominance, in possession of the political resources, and social organization was represented as autonomy is not strong, the purpose is not obvious, folk character, purpose is ambiguous, and some community-based organizations and not-for-profit, non-assignable components especially complex, attached to the Government, and is not based on a social choice depends on the society. So, in this kind of cooperation under the surface, lurking on a series of contradictions, this conflict with economic development and the gradual, but contradictory relationship between the solution to social organization can be independent development, growth and social stability of coordination.In the transition period, the Government and community organizations in the binary asymmetric collaboration scenarios, already exists at the following questions, one is based on the cultural factors of asymmetric development, currently in transition, social organizations in copious and certain growth, although in developing their own big reason, you experience the bottleneck of development, but to a large extent, this no doubt and Government in the presence of large, Government due to tradition, virtually always think that the development of social organization is detrimental to the country, especially on the Government's legitimacy in the citizen constitutes a serious threat, but in the current globalization process, the State in order to realize their modernization, and had to rely on the power of social organization to accomplish their goals, but also to prevent the growth of social organization on your own form of threats. The second is based on the legitimacy of authority factors asymmetric development, social organization as a meeting of the society of law, culture, environment, quality, and so on a number of factors are still immature condition, to make government policies to strive for a concession is not possible. Therefore, the party since inception to its legality and struggling, in success, it is very difficult to allow other organizations to infiltrate into came in, so if you say that traditional cultural factors influenced the Government on social organization position in society, then the validity status of factors also constitute a transformed society organization development factor. The third is based on the scheduling of social resources asymmetry, for a growing social organizations, are available and can be scheduled on how much social resources for organizations is fatal, he relates to the independence of an organization. In the transition Government and community organizations which, by the party under the leadership of the Government's social, economic and political resources, and the broader mass basis, into a new era of economic construction, modernization of the country. By contrast, social organizations, mass basis regardless of social, economic resources and Government are serious asymmetry. Makes social organization in the development process had to rely on powerful government organization.Check-in this, the authors try to attempt to exploit Western has proven theory, and coupled with the Chinese situation made a number of constructive comments, makes the transition Government and community organizations to effective cooperation, operation. But the first thing you need to do this, I think that you must implement the institutionalization of social selection is based on the criteria for the development of social organization, currently in transition, the Government and community organizations do not symmetry development first can be resolved from the institutionalized. First, the level of the institutionalized in order to guarantee long-term Government and community-based organizations of their respective roles. At the same time, in the legislative, to further standardize the social organization of and bypass, in our present state and political system, to define their own social organization, the system must have materialized, specification, hierarchical, and so on. Second, in system level ensures the efficient running of social organization, as a community-based organizations need to do is how to strengthen their social base, that is, the establishment of social organization is not based on the Government's needs, but because society needs, only in this way, in order to guarantee social organizations have extensive social base and mass basis. In addition, strong institutional guarantees, social organizations in strictly to its own position, based on the needs of the community, in order to firmly rooted in the crowd, to provide effective services, to some extent share the Government's burden to the Government to reduce management costs, while it also indirectly affect the behavior of the Government, the Government in the legislative, administrative and policy measures, and so had to take into account the interests of social organization. Secondly, based on a rational choice for Government and society in the interests of equality between organizations to Exchange, the Government of a series of projects, community-based organizations can act as a link, as the Government share some common functions, reducing the cost of social administration, but, in reality, the Government's behaviour can be deeply affecting social organization, and social organizations are always subject to the Government's behavior, because social organizations sometimes deliver government services, which is at present the Government and community organizations in transactions during the asymmetry, last, it will definitely lead to social organizations rely on the Government, to give status, makes the development of social organization cannot be independent. Therefore, in the transition period, community-based organizations to jump out of the obstacles to the development of communities, it was necessary to do so:first, and the Government's "transactions", to be able to provide to the Government's urgent and necessary public goods and services, play an active role in the community. Second, to actively look for alternative resources, seek funding diversification, maintain their independence of development. Only in this way, in the transition period, our social organizations to jump out of the neck, with the right direction.