Government Performance Evaluation Index System Optimization Study

At present, the Government Performance Evaluation Index System of our country has some defects. There is bias in the value during building the system. There is short of some areas of value, for example public services, public responsibility, fair and so on. People who evaluate the performance of government is too single, which is lack of public participation, representation and diversity. The content of evaluation is not comprehensive and has too much economics. Indicators of evaluation emphasis on economic indicators unilaterally and dominant performance, and it despises potential performance. The method of evaluation is qualitative, which is lack of quantitative analysis and regulations. Procedures of evaluation is lack of standardization, and too randomness. The results of evaluation are unscientific or false. It is wrong to treat the evaluation as the purpose. The evaluation pays no attention to the construction of mechanism of using the results effectively. It can not analyze and use the results scientifically. So it can not promote the improvement of government performance, which is not suitable as the main measure for evaluate government performance and does not meet the requirements of the Scientific Development Concept.According with the spirit of the times, we should on the basis of the spirit of the Scientific Development Concept to optimize the Government Performance Evaluation Index System. We should optimize some aspects, for example, the methods of evaluating, people who evaluate the government performance, index, proportion, the use of evaluation results and so on. In accordance with the spirit of the Scientific Development Concept, we take the government of Junan, Linyi, Shandong Province as an example and optimize the Government Performance Evaluation Index System. When we build the system, we use the scientific evaluation methods and standard evaluation procedures. The index of evaluation is comprehensive, which can involve economic, social, human and other factors, focusing on short-term indicators and long-term indicators. People who evaluate the government performance are diversity, and pay attention to the participation of citizen. The proportion is reasonable. The system is multi-level and easy to operate. And it also focuses on the analysis and the use of evaluation results.