| The paper pays more attention to the students and the people who have tight relationship with them in daily-life. The theory foundation of it is the symbolic interactionism of Erving Goffman. Molding self-imagine in students' culture is common too. It has tight relationship with interaction between the people live around. These interaction regards to mirror the students to us .It also shows implementation of strategies we have never discovered.Students express themselves through language and actions. Students' language in daily-life is the code in my paper. This contains oral language and actions in days, for example: composition, dairy, column, blog and writing. We also pay attention to body-languages which is more meaningful. It is close to the reality to some extent. To say more, my aim is to show their strategies in interactions. In end, I want to show what they said, what they did and why they did like this.Meaning comes from their language and interaction. In daily time of school, the interactive objects of junior school students are their teachers and their classmates. They choose interaction way by what they have seen and who they met. Interaction constructs our society. Everyone is a chart of the social life. We can not be departed from it. Social relationship shapes in their actions. What influenced their actions is the knowledge they learned, force resource and social relationship from their older generations.The meaning in interaction forms an angle of view for understanding. Social resource is the foundation of the actions. Individuals change their interactive way in different places. The kinds of interaction belongs to the kind of resource .Interaction mold their shape, then the social shape decided their actions. Allocation and exchanging of resource regulates individual's interactions. They also show their strategies in interactions. The more the educators pay attentions to students, the more the understanding will follow. |
PDF Full Text Request