Font Size: a A A

On The Discourse Functions Of Discourse Markers And And But

Posted on:2013-02-03Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y B ZhaoFull Text:PDF
GTID:2215330362463143Subject:Foreign Linguistics and Applied Linguistics
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
The research object of the present thesis is the discourse functions of discoursemarkers and and but. Applying discourse markers and and but properly can realize thesmooth and successful communication.This thesis is a supplementary research on the pragmatic functions of and and but onthe basis of formers' research. On the whole, the pragmatic functions of and includefunction of step-up, introducing topics, sequence, mild transition, indicating emotion,trying out, talk-turn taking, falsifying, delaying, dynamic feature. The pragmatic functionsof but include function of comparison, concession, substitution, canceling, introducingnew ideas, summary marker, speech repair, restriction, emotion mechanism, talk-turntaking, falsifying function. In the corpus,2200words are marked. The text analysis toolConcordance is used to calculate the statistics. The linguistic devices are tagged in thecorpus, followed by qualitative and quantitative analyses. The present thesis investigatesthe positions of and and but in the discourse, and finds out more falsifying pragmatic andsemantic functions. As discourse markers, and and but undergo the grammaticalizationprocess during the development of human language. And and but turn to the falsifyingmeaning from the actual meaning. On the extent of falsification, and is more obvious thanbut.The pragmatic functions of and and but play an important part in the coherence ofdiscourse. This thesis holds that and and but mainly function in the action and ideationalstructure, based on the discourse coherence model proposed by Schiffrin-exchangestructure, action structure, ideational structure, participation frame, information state.At last, this thesis researches the reasons and mechanisms of the grammaticallizationprocess of and and but, that is, the reasons that cause falsifying function appear. Moreover,subjectivity, erosion, decategory, pragmatic strength and semantic weakening are theimportant factors that cause the appearance of the grammaticalization. Therefore, and andbut can express the non-truth value meaning. The author of the thesis hopes that the result of the study may provide some usefulreference for the research of discourse markers.
Keywords/Search Tags:pragmatic functions, non-truth value meaning, coherence, grammaticalization
PDF Full Text Request
Related items