.19 Late 20th Century Tsarist Russia Invaded Tibet Strategy Analysis

This paper explores the historical materialism and dialectical materialism, under the guidance of the fields with the special requirements, use history, ethnology, religion, political sociology and related theory and principle, adopt the method, with the interdisciplinary existing Chinese, English, Russian historical material and translation finishing Tibetan material, and widely absorbs the domestic and foreign relevant reference and research results, based on the 19th century and the early 20th century, English, Russian two countries in Asia, especially in Tibet and the Tibetan race situation during Russian invasion in different stages, measures to different strategies and expression analysis and research of Russia invaded Tibet, aiming at the relatively rational questions about reading.This research mainly divided into three parts:The first part, "British Russia to compete and in Asia early to Tibet's coveted tsarist with aggression" to the first topic, through after the industrial revolution, Asia falls into all the powers, especially English, Russian these two imperialist countries is the main target crazy dispute, the paper explore Chinese Tibet are able to cause English, Russian, and combined with the reason interest in two countries in Tibetan areas in Asia and aggression problems a series of planning and strategy formulated that the contrast analysis, relative to the preliminary UK armed aggression, Russia has taken strategy and means more latent and risk this feature. At the same time through in the nineteen seventies Russia to Tibet, before the invasion activity of various discusses, reveals the ambitions of Tibet tsarist government has a long history.The second part, with "late 19th and early 20th century Russia to Tibet's aggression" analysis and research topic, mainly in the Russian invasion of Tibet on the issue and its corresponding to the various strategies expression, and a conclusion that the Russian invasion of China, Tibet is a long process, it in different situation, adopted different policies and different ways of aggression, and points out that the conclusion of Russian attempt to devour Tibet is always there, ambition and is more and more big, until 1917, October revolution broke out, the tsarist Russia was overthrown, the new Soviet regime was born and sketched the new regime of socialist foreign policy, Russia to China's Tibet before finally end the aggression.The third part, epilogue. In this part, through the two front part of the sum-up, further emphasise Russia in order to realize their dominating the ambitions of Asia and the world, is do what I can, without its need not, a thought to separate Tibet from China, but the objective facts is Tibet present are part of China's territory, is indivisible, and all previous central government are in Tibet on the sovereignty, where exercise all aggression activities and divisive ACTS by the central government and will be resolutely boycott of the Tibetan people, so, Russia to Tibet's aggression will route to failure.