Comparative Study Of The Concept For Autonomy

Autonomy refers to all the members of an autonomous subject can be conscious, freely participate in social affairs. Autonomy formed a complete theoretical system in the process of enriching and developing constantly.Most of the traditional gentry of China is the retired officials, and they will continue to play a role as a tool of imperial power in the local community after they returned home .The imperial power can't reach the county, so the gentry is in the in the management of their local community for emperor .Actuallyor it was the extension of imperial regime in rural society. Gentry Autonomy is based on amily, blood ties, community-based elders rule, and their personal attachment to the family or society was a preconditionhis to this autonomy, and the person had lost an independent, which is not conducive to cultivation of autonomy needed to build a democratic system Soil. Because of the lack of training of individual autonomy.In the autonomous mode, most of the gentry is the subjects rather than citizens of training.The township autonomy of US is espected by Protestant and the spirit of contracts, which encourage personal struggle, and each person is the subject of autonomy, equality between people according to contract together to form towns, villages and towns to achieve self-management. Therefore, everyone in the town will have a sense of democracy, contract awareness, independence, legal awareness, etc., so that people can be referred to as qualified citizen. Therefore, most of the U.S. Rural Self trained and qualified citizens, and it is one of the direct political effects that the establishment of a democratic political system.Although the traditional Chinese gentry autonomy is very similar to the township autonomyof the United States on the surface, in fact, it is very different. It is the same to autonomous, but its effect on political practices is completely different. Gentry Autonomy is to train the Chinese subjects, but the United States is training citizens. subjects were more qualified, more favorable to the despotism; the more qualified citizens, the better development of democratic politics.