| Price Hearing as China's market economy and the corresponding price changes and development decision-making system, and has already formed a relatively complete system of systems. "PRC Price Law" and "hearing the government pricing approach," the introduction of our price hearing to establish the legal status and legal effect, regulate the procedures of our price hearing, marking the price hearing system in our country embarked on a new level. Price objective is to promote public hearing participation and the democratization of pricing decisions, the hearing will be held in a lawful, fair, open, efficient principle, the main body of this hearing from the price, scope, legal effect, interpretation of the specific procedures and other aspects Our price hearing system clarifies the function of positioning the price of the hearing fair, public participation, transparency, rational choice and legal norms, and improve efficiency.Functional hearing in the positioning of the price based on the proposed price of the hearing of the shortage, mainly from the price of the basic system of the hearing, the hearing before the readiness hearing, the process of meeting and after the hearing to elaborate several aspects of the treatment was found The first hearing of the basic price system is imperfect, embodied in the legal system is not perfect, hearing the directory is not comprehensive, neglected aspects of the informal system; Second, the price of the preparation of the hearing, the organizers and the neutrality of the hearing were not clear representation of the hearing participants, the lack of hearing ability and hearing schedule on the formula in many of the wrong place; third meeting was held in the hearing process, the host how to ensure the neutrality and professionalism from on hearing will have an important influence, the hearing opaque meetings, agenda and other issues Cheng reasonable arrangements to be resolved; Fourth, the price after the conclusion of the hearing, the legal effect of the hearing record was not sufficiently clear so that the hearing will easily become a mere formality, and public interaction inadequate and can not take full advantage of the effects of hearing extensive collection of views, despite the 2008 introduction of the "Hearing the government set prices" have made great progress, but there are many in all aspects of the problem, worthy of our discussion and resolution.This article on the United States, Germany, Japan and other countries to study the price of the hearing, although the countries have since advantages and disadvantages, but in general the price hearing system has been developed quite perfect. Especially the U.S., widely used informal system is very extensive range of hearing, the hearing system has become a common expression of public way. America's "Administrative Procedure Act" is a procedural law cloth very well, but has not yet been introduced in China, as well as many not up to standard procedures of the hearing results greatly reduced. Most of the foreign price of a public hearing for the principle that the public can fully participate in the process of pricing decisions, the public participation hearings are also very convenient prices. And the United States have well-established security mechanisms such as the cost of going to an independent agency, so the cost estimates from government price as the scientific basis for decision-making; also mature consumer associations, to gather information to help consumers access, funding security; even difficult to provide grants to participate in the hearing, the system user-friendly design makes the price hearing system is really the price of a full public participation consultation mechanism, the views of the public to be fully expressed, and can reflect the decision-making to the final pricing to, of course, also thanks to the United States files an exclusive system. Also mentioned in the price of hearing people, bear the cost of the hearing so many things to learn and can learn from.The final chapter the analysis and judgments based on the above proposed construction of the price hearing system thinking. In the basic system, the existing laws and regulations also need to constantly improve, also imminent introduction of procedural law, the hearing approach also requires continuous improvement of the system should be more emphasis on the use of non-hearing. Preparation before the hearing is also critical, the price hearing involved a very wide range of interest groups, some of the cost of computing is also very complex and professional, be lengthened time for the hearing notice publicity, so that the hearing participants have sufficient time to prepare; hearing filed may enrichment, pricing agencies and the organizers should follow the separation of functions between the system and change the status quo now Zhengqibufen to protect the impartiality of the hearing; in the hearing process of the meeting, to ensure impartiality and professionalism of the host sex, and explore professional Hearing system, pay attention to the rigor of the hearing agenda, the protection of the hearing on the basis of results of streamlined procedures as far as possible, but also give full play to the news media and networking platform, and improve the transparency of the hearing proceedings; Finally, After the hearing, the hearing report, hearing transcripts and listen to all sides on the basis of fair and just to make pricing decisions, and the final result and the reasons made public. As we continue to explore and improve the process, I believe the price decision-making system will move toward our original goal. |
PDF Full Text Request