Font Size: a A A

Beijing Normal University With A Comparative Study Of "function" For High Content

Posted on:2013-05-08Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:A M WangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2247330371992047Subject:Subject teaching
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Textbooks are important tools to achieve the course objectives, teaching resources of theteachers’ teaching and students’ learn. Since ancient times, from domestic to foreign countries, thetextbooks are on an important and prominent position. In order to help teachers and students withcreative teaching and learning, materials should follow the students’ cognitive law, to adapt to thedevelopment of students, which are educational, scientific, applicability, readability, etc.... With therapid development of today’s society, and era of progress, people’s attitudes are changes, of course,knowledge should be subject to change. Close ties with the life and times, this is a textbookbackground material based on.With the "High School Mathematics Curriculum Standards (Experimental)" promulgated andimplemented, there have been five versions of math textbooks. In Anhui Province, the use ofmathematic textbooks which are the version of Beijing Normal University is widespread. While inShangdong Province, which are an A version of mathematic textbooks are more common. Thispaper focuses on these two versions of the textbooks (Required one)"function " is part of study, theused literature analysis, statistical analysis, survey research on the comparative study of twoversions of textbooks.First, compare two versions of the preparation of the concept two versions of the concept, twoversions of the concept in written are common, there are different places, preparations of teachingmaterials philosophy is the understanding of the writing team on curriculum standards, theirunderstanding to the preparation of teaching materials, of course, written materials may be different,but they are prepared in accordance with the curriculum standards, the starting point are good.Second, compare the two versions of the content. Including directory comparison, as well assome basic knowledge of the contents of the comparison, by comparison knowledge changes, thereare also changes in some places.Third, compare two versions of exercises. Exercises including the comparison of examples,comparison of practices, comparison of exercises and revisions. These exercises are including thenumber of questions and type of questions.Finally, compare the two versions of the quality characteristics. Quality evaluation includingscientific, educational, advanced, practical, applicable, relevant, interesting and readable, is basedon the content of these quality assessment of two versions of the textbooks to evaluate comparability. The end of the article on the basics comparison of high school mathematics textbooks(Required one) function is part of comprehensive evaluations, and make some my ownsuggestions.
Keywords/Search Tags:High School, Mathematic Textbooks, Function, Comparative Study
PDF Full Text Request
Related items