Economic Analysis Of The Feasibility Of The New Rural Old-age Home Mode

At present, China’s promotion of the main mode of government as the main body,community service, based on the old-age home. compared with the original familypension and institutional pension, This pension model more suited to China’s nationalconditions, but there are still some problems. For example, narrow coverage, theuneven endowment QOS, or even some of the services impossiblely achieve less thanthe basic living standards of the elderly needs. These problems gradually revealed, thecontradiction between the growing material and cultural needs of the elderly and thesingle pension model are more obvious, it is bound to seek a more comprehensivepension service mode. For rural areas, as the outflow of labor and family sizedecreases, the traditional family pension has been unable to meet the changes now,and the rural economy is not very well developed, the pension agency also has somelimitations, relative comparison, the old-age home is quite feasible, but it should notbe the same with the Urban Family mode, because some of the professional servicesteam can not keep up, so there should be a new model of home care, in order to adaptto the current situation of rural.using documentary research, comparative analysis and induction of existingtheoretical literature research and investigation of the reality of the situation,this paper,analyze the pros and cons of different pension mode, using the theory of economics,the paper analysis rural home pension, a kind of new mode, in rural certainly theold-age home mode is viability in the future. According to the actual situation of therural family pension is the ideal pension model to the old people, but with theweakening of the functions of the family as well as the outflow of rural labor, familypension mode has been powerless; institutional pension model, due to underdevelopedrural economy,the necessary facilities for the elderly is not a very good,specificlymissing nursing home, worse even beds tension, or poor quality of service, but the main thing is not a professional team. Age home should be more in line with modernreality, but nor should the Urban Family, after all, the rural conditions do not reach.After weighing the pros and cons, I advocate the rural old-age home mode should beunderstood as an introverted style pension mode. In other words, if the rural elderlycan make their own pension, the government should give some subsidies, if not theirown pension, above all, children are charge of the pension, but the government mustbe involved, if the child do it, the Government will also have a certain reward. Andthis proportion will make children be willing to the pension. But the precondition isstill living at home, relatives and neighborhood community service.