Effects Of Peer Relationship Inequity Aversion To Children

Inequity aversion is an expression of people’s prosocial behavior, it is refers to the peopleto the unfair result and unfair intention of disgust, reflected in many aspects, such as in theallocation of resources, the recipient inequity aversion, the allocation of inequity aversion,and third party punishment unfair reflect inequity aversion etc.. This research mainly toexplore the relationship of inequity aversion to children.Experiment one: in the variant dictator game, children do not know the recipient dictatorwhether to accept or reject the choice of children, have significant differences on decisiongood friend or stranger is in the scene allocation scheme under the same. The results showthat: for different relationships, difference of decision behavior of children the dictator’ssignificant. But the difference of reaction behavior of different allocation scheme does notreflect the significant differences in decision making. Found in the satisfaction measurement,for different degrees of unfair allocation scheme, there is a significant difference, thedictator’s satisfaction which, justice and benefit, fair and unfair allocation scheme againstunfair have significant difference, but the difference between good and bad unfair, unjustdistribution of decision satisfaction is not significant.Experiment two: in the classic ultimatum game, to investigate whether the allocationprogram recipients from good friends and strangers will have significantly differentdecision-making behavior. The results show that: children recipients for another person toallocate rewards are good friends or strangers, for there was no significant difference betweenthe favorable distribution and fair distribution. At the same time in the decision response timebut had no significant differences, differences in decision-making satisfaction and behaviorsimilarity.Experiment three: in the distribution of game, as the third party distributor to friends andstrangers to distribute rewards children, whether the different decision-making behavior of thesame allocation scheme. The results show that: the difference between good friends andstrangers children distribution among decision behavior significantly. Decision time analysisof children by children react, found to affect relationship on children’s decision-makingbehavior is not reflected in the decision of the time. Further analysis showed that differentdecision time with no significant difference. But the difference between good friends andstrangers children distribution among decision satisfaction.The results are as follows: 1.The relation between the children’s proponents inequity aversion decision-makingbehavior and decision-making satisfaction effect, but is not reflected in the decision of thereaction time.2.Children and strangers allocation recipient refused to more than the number of goodfriends and decision distribution. Effect of reaction relationships on children’s decision ismainly reflected in the decision-making behavior of recipients, children affected the degree offairness is reflected in two aspects of decision-making behavior and the decision-makingsatisfaction. These effects are not reflected in the reaction time.3.In the children as the third party to friends and strangers to distribute rewards scenario,relationship, influence the child the allocating behavior and decision satisfaction. Therelationship of the children distribution inequity aversion.