The Mobilization Of Collective Action In Urban Community

With the deepening of reform and opening up and rapid economic development, the demolition seems to have become unavoidable in everyday city scenery. Because of the demolition caused by various conflicts not only the large number of very high intensity, seriously affecting the social stability and harmony. Research groups in urban demolition conflicts, both strong theoretical significance, but also has a strong practical value, capable of easing social conflicts, improve social management level some valuable policy recommendations. In this paper, some city residents oppose the demolition and renovation of S community collective action as a case study of the dynamic mechanism of urban collective action problems, and how to reduce group conflicts like to make some thinking.Accordingly, this article is divided into four parts:the first part is the theory of collective action in the context of the Western sort out and commented for this article follow the theoretical basis for collective action problems; second part is related to the concept of collective action areas defined and S-community collective action against the demolition and renovation of the profile of the incident involving the large number of longer duration, the larger social impact, and ultimately to win over residents, as a case is more appropriate; The third part is the focus, namely through the "qi" production and development variables, the cost-benefit analysis of rational variables and mobilization explore three dimensions variable dynamic mechanism of collective action problems. First, the use of the concept of unique Chinese culture "qi" for analysis, analysis of the causes of the structural problems such as "qi" to some extent continue to accumulate, and then through the dispersion type or the outbreak of the release process in two ways, in Based on this point, in order to obtain the value of human dignity and personality to achieve emotional factors on the impact of urban residents protest. Secondly, the actors into activists and the general categories of actors in collective action and the whole process before the occurrence of these two types of actors involved in collective action through the costs, benefits, costs and benefits as well as the possibility of access to these three point continuously calculated to determine whether to participate in collective action and participation and to what extent, through the analysis, the paper argues that based on the cost-benefit analysis of the rational factor is the driving force behind urban collective action mechanism, but that should not be overlooked while other factors. Finally, from a social reality is not to generate collective action in respect of a pinch, leading to collective action among variables also need some sort of intermediary process led bridge take the line, isolated variables will not necessarily lead to collective action, so The meaning of this mediation process is divided into a total of two stages of mobilization and the mobilization of means, including the mobilization of public discourse, persuasive communication and awareness raising three levels, and interpersonal networks, collective identity, and political opportunity structure and other factors are both affecting the mobilization, urban collective action to mobilize grass-roots mobilization model showing characteristics; fourth part is the contents of the above discussion, the proposed collective action against the city four countermeasures.