The Research Of The System Of Evaluating Quality Of Cases

The system of evaluating quality of cases is an innovative of quality management of court cases in china,what is also called as the system of evaluating and supervising the quality of cases.It is implemented in prcatice to varying degees,however,there ie a wide range dispute on its natue,role,specific operations.Different understanding result in different proscessing of it,it achieved different result. In This paper I attempt to find out reasonable value of the system.although I think that it is this is only a transitional system, but in this transition phase should make good use of it to carry out its function,regulate the conduct of the trial, and improve the quality of trials, and establish judicial authority,Of course, requires a combination of the other system.The first part of the article, an overview of the system evaluating quality of cases.Firstly I define its connotation and extension the definition of quality evaluation of the results of the case, I believe that the definition of a thing is for communication needs, but also to reveal the purpose of the design of this system, ievaluating quality of casess only a means, the definition of assessment investigation should reveal the purpose of the system.I check the edge of the case evaluation briefly, it can be said that the case assessment investigation is a combination of top-down and bottom-up reform. At the end of the part, I made a note of the cases quality evaluation of the legal basis and practical basis. The case assessment investigation needs supervision to the jurisdiction of the courts, but also the need for reform of the trial management concepts and trial management style, it is the reality of high-quality trial quality and the need to regulate the conduct of the trial.The second part, the relationships between thesystem of the case quality evaluation and other supervisory systems. This ystem itself has certain oversight property, but in fact it is a non-procedural law within the supervision. I compared the syeten with procedures of judicial supervision,the system of the judge wrong case to be investigated and the judge disciplinary system. I believe that wrong case investigation system has serious deficiencies,Should be abolished.The judge’s misconduct should be punished. We kan replace the wrong case investigation systemwith the system of evaluating quality of cases and the judge disciplinary system.The third part of the article, the status of the cases the quality evaluation system. Since the implementation of the system of case assessment check, geting some positive effect. but there are also misunderstanding of the nature, somebody even despise even rejecting the system. Institutional design is not unified, result in the communication between the Court is not smooth. Programming is not enough scientific consuming judicial resources, is not conducive to long-term adherence, will result in the assessment check reduced to a mere formality The lack of other systems supporting the the case quality evaluation play a very limited role.The fourth part, the reform and improvement of the system of quality evaluation of cases.Firstly I redifines the systemof quality evaluation of cases,Its object is cases already in force,evalulating after the end of the trial,also a temporary system.How to refine and improve the syetem,including the subject which shouled be evaluated,the scope of the cases,investigators who evaluates and so on,what is the last and most important thing I will solve.