Research On The Problem Of Public Participation In Judicial Reform

With the gradual establishment of socialist market economy, the maturity of democratic politics, and the concept of the constitutional rule of law, social increasingly bred more scientific and call for more and more democratic judicial system and its accompanying operating mechanism.The Third Plenary Session of Eleventh Central Committee put forward that " Constructing the rule of law, China must adhere to the rule of law, ruling according to law, promoting administration according to law, adhere to the country under the rule of law and the rule of law of government, and the law of society construction. We will deepen reform of the judicial system and speed up the construction of a fair, efficient and authoritative socialist judiciary system to safeguard people’s rights and interests, let the people in perception of fairness and justice ". Visibility, judicial reform is the necessary path built by the modern judicial system. It promotes the judicial democracy, judicial openness, justice goal realization, and inevitable choices for the construction of a socialist country ruled by law. For a long time, China’s judicial reform take the system in closed reform way, whether it researches policy draft, or organizes the implementation and evaluation or the leading role of the judicial organ. The public does not have the opportunity to put forward their views and suggestions on the judicial reform initiatives. Judicial reform has made certain achievements, but judicial corruption, low judicial authority, judicial independence and judicial injustice phenomenon is still widespread; judicial shall have the function of normal play also severely affected. In view of this, the public of judicial reform has put forward higher and newer requirements. Just like "justice is for the public, all justice as, should be in the position of the public to think". Therefore, public participation, become an important part of judicial reform.This paper uses the method references, system studies, comparative analysis and other methods, discusses the nature and characteristics of China’s judicial, summed up the current public participation in judicial activities and the basic form of the judicial reform achievements, shortcomings of our judicial reform in public participation is not enough, lack of participation system, and on the based on the experience of the judicial activities of foreign public participation experience, finally from two aspects of system and mechanism, try to meet the conditions of our country’s judicial reform of public participation in the system construction and path design. The innovation of this article is, through, to see a lot of data, to re-examine the many problems of public participation in China’s judicial reform, and combined with the practice, to set up the Judicial Reform Commission reform matters, simplified triage, public participation in step by step. In order to better safeguard the public’s right to know, to participate, and supervise the right to vote in the judicial reform in the field of judicial reform, to further promote the development of science and democracy.