Performance Evaluation Of Local Court System Illustrated By The Example Of Wuhaiintermediate People’s Court

Courts in recent years in management performance evaluation is the rise of the emerging field of court things, but a performance evaluation system was introduced in court administration, have led to great changes in the management of the courts local courts have introduced performance appraisal system Court. But during the real operation, our court system has yet to be able to row in a national court performance evaluation system, the performance evaluation system standards vary around the court to assess the quality varies greatly. In Wuhai Intermediate People’s Court, for example, the City Court in accordance with the spirit of the Supreme Court case on the court to assess the quality of case quality assessment system developed in the region. Outstanding achievements in the same time, the court in which the actual running performance evaluation, we have found unreasonable indicators to assess the tendency to quantify fine, the lack of comprehensive quality assessment methods, and issues such as the scope of examination is not clear. Learn from the experience of the court to assess the performance of future directions of the reform is more hierarchical set on the index, concise, comprehensive, and more emphasis on external evaluation of the Court, to assess more open, more social responsiveness Therefore, to improve court performance evaluation system, we can start setting targets from several aspects, concepts and tools to improve the evaluation system, process control and performance evaluation of the existing security system, court performance evaluation system for change. Judicial performance evaluation requires both top-level and system design concepts, but also a scientific methodology and assessment tools, in the specific operation to keep some of the remarkable performance evaluation system for correction and improvement, to improve court performance evaluation reasonable set of indicators resistance, strengthening external evaluation of the Court, the Court of enhanced responsiveness to the public, so as to enhance the legitimacy of the court performance evaluation.