Evaluation Study On Agricultural Firm Green Technology Absorption

With the social and economic development, human damage to the environmentin agricultural production is rising. The introduction of green technology, more andmore agricultural enterprises to improve their competitiveness by reducing pollutionand lower raw material costs. The introduction of green technology, more and moreagricultural enterprises to improve their competitiveness by reducing pollution andlower raw material costs. However, few studies of the absorption capacity of thedomestic and foreign scholars on green technology, Especially, agricultural enterprisesto absorb green technology capacity analysis.This study absorption in enterprise knowledge under the guidance of the theory,the theoretical framework of green technology absorptive capacity to buildagricultural enterprises, green technology absorptive capacity is divided into fivedimensions, including the level of prior knowledge, green technology acquiring, greentechnology digestion, green technology transfer and green technology using; designedthe agricultural enterprises green technology absorption capacity evaluation indexsystem on the basis of it analysis, which designed the questionnaire of agriculturalenterprises the survey collect first-hand data on43agricultural enterprises in FujianProvince; then use the entropy weight method to determine the weight of each indexand a comprehensive evaluation of the sample agricultural enterprises greentechnology absorption capacity; ultimately based on the evaluation index weightsreflect the importance of enhance agricultural enterprises green technology absorptivecapacity policy recommendations.Through theoretical analysis and empirical research, the main conclusions:(1) To build a set of agricultural enterprises green technology absorption capacityevaluation index system, including the five-level indicators and15secondaryindicators, level indicators have prior knowledge of the agricultural enterprises, theability to obtain green technology, green technology digestion, green technologytransfer capabilities, the use of green technology capacity; two indicators are greentechnology stock of knowledge, research the level of cooperation, the level ofcooperation with their peers, competitors, the introduction of green technologyachievements fees, the level of staff qualifications, staff training and level of investment.(2) Collect data through questionnaires, the use of entropy weight method todetermine the various indicators rights, an indicator in the right major small as follows:agricultural enterprises green technology to obtain capacity> agricultural enterprisesgreen digestion capacity> agricultural enterprises green technology priori knowledge> the agricultural enterprises green technology transformation capacity> agriculturalenterprises green technology utilization capacity; the secondary index weights are asfollows: the introduction of new technological achievements costs> Green stock oftechnical knowledge cooperative level> employees’ education level> staff trainingand the level of investment> employee communication and knowledge-sharing level>the degree of employee participation in decision-making. The green technologyacquisition and digestion of agricultural enterprises green technology absorptioncapacity influence; introduction of new technological achievements cost, greentechnology knowledge stock and other factors also have a significant impact onagricultural green technology absorption capacity, and between the two has a positiveCorrelationThis study will be the first time a priori knowledge of agricultural enterprises aspart of the green technology absorption, the establishment of five dimensions ofagricultural enterprises green technology absorption theoretical framework to identifythe critical impact of agricultural enterprises green technology absorption capacity,innovation and to have set up a agricultural enterprises, green technology absorptioncapacity evaluation index system, to a certain extent make up for the current academicin the field research gaps.