| Objectiveget Observing and contrasting the clinical effection and effect onset time of acupoint thread-embedding therapy and electric acupuncture therapy in the treatment of simple obesity.Methods Diving the 81 patients who were diagnosd with simple obesity and from the department of acupuncture and moxibustion of Hubei Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital randomly into three groups:the control group,the therapy group A,therapy group B,each group with 27 patients.The control group were given the therapy of diet and exercise,one month for course,both three course. On the basis of the control group,the therapy group A were chosen point like Zhongwan,Tianshu(dilateral),Shuifen,Daheng(dilateral), Shuidao,Daimai(dilateral),Zhigou(dilateral), Quchi(dilateral),Yinlingquan(dilateral),Zusanli(dilateral), Fenglong(dilatera), Sanyinjiao(dilateral).Two pairs points of therapy group A on the abdomen were with disperse-dense wave,disperse wave with 4 HZ,dense wave with 20 HZ.Treatment of the next day at a time, each time for 30 minutes,fifteen times forone course,both three courses. On the basis of the controlgroup,therapy group B points were same with the therapy group A.Eachtime 9-11 points were chosen to therapy group B with acupointthread-embedding,ten days for once,three times for a course,boththree course.After three courses,observing the difference ofweight,BMI,waistline of each course respectively.Results 1.After the first course,the effective of the control groupã€the therapy group Aã€the therapy group B were respectively 14.81%ã€59.30% 〠33.33%.The control group and the therapy B had no statistically significant difference(P>0.05),while the therapy group A and the control group had statistically significant difference(P<0.05),the effective of two treatment group were similar(P>0.05).After the second course,the effective of the control groupã€the therapy group Aã€the therapy group B were respectively 51.85%ã€85.19%ã€81.48%.The control group and the therapy A had statistically significant difference(P<0.05),the therapy group B and the control group had statistically significant difference(P<0.05),the effective of two treatment group were similar(P > 0.05).After the third course,the effective of the control groupã€the therapy group Aã€the therapy group B were respectively 72.00%ã€92.31%ã€92.59%.The control group and the therapy A had statistically significant difference(P<0.05),the therapy group B and the control group had statistically significant difference(P<0.05),the effective of two treatment group were similar(P>0.05). 2.In control group the weight loss contrasting the pre-treatment after the first and the second course had nostatistically significant difference(P > 0.05), while it had statistically significant difference after the third course(P<0.05).The two treatment group the weight loss contrasting the pre-treatment after the first course had no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).The two treatment group the weight loss contrasting the pre-treatment after the second and the third course had statistically significant difference(P<0.05),While the weight loss between the two treatment groups had no significant difference(P>0.05). 3.In control group the BMI loss contrasting the pre-treatment after the first and the second course had no statistically significant difference(P > 0.05), while it had statistically significant difference after the third course(P<0.05).The two treatment group the BMI loss contrasting the pre-treatment after the first course had no statistically significant difference(P> 0.05).The two treatment group the BMI loss contrasting the pre-treatment after the second and the third course had statistically significant difference(P<0.05),While the BMI loss between the two treatment groups had no significant difference(P>0.05). 4.In control group the waistline loss contrasting the pre-treatment after the first and the second course had no statistically significant difference(P > 0.05), while it had statistically significant difference after the third course(P<0.05).The therapy group A the waistline loss contrasting the pre-treatment after the first,the second and the third course had statistically significant difference(P<0.05).The therapy group B waistline loss contrasting pre- treatment after the first coursehad no statistically significant difference(P>0.05), while it had statistically significant difference after the secong and the third course(P<0.05). The waistline loss after the second and the third course between two treatment group had no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion Acupoint thread-embedding therapy and electric acupuncture therapy in the treatment of simple obesity are both efficient.And the effect between the two treatment have no significant difference.But the effect onset time of the electric acupuncture therapy is earlier than acupoint thread-embedding therapy. |