| With the accelerate aging, since family structure changed and the concept of pension changed, the pension problem is growing concern. There are many factors that affect the aging population, including the family structure of "4-2-1", the "raising children for pension" concept changed, the shortage of public pension institutions. Meanwhile, with the urban and rural economic development and population to the cities, the style of community pension and family pension can not meet the needs of the elderly. Therefore, relying solely on the government and family to provide protection is very difficult. In order to reduce the burden of government and families, while ensuring the quality of life of the older, some new pension models are appearing. Social enterprise for old-age care is a new type of pension model, and it has unique advantages. However, the development of the emerging pension model is difficult, due to legal constraints, the policy bias-public pension institutions, lack of funds and nurses, small-scale and so on.This paper based on national conditions, welfare pluralism theory, social welfare social theory and active aging theory combines with national existing three major pension model as the starting point, and has a comparative analysis of the community pension, public pension institutions and Social enterprise for old-age care on the point of macro policy and funding. In current, there are two representative social enterprise for old-age care in the country, this paper compares them in terms of operation and management, and analysis of their strengths and problems. The last, this paper combines with the current pension situation and learns the success experience of the world’s social enterprise for old-age care, to explore the future development of this pension model. |