Legal Regulation Of Our Network Anti-corruption

Corruption is a political problem confronting various countries worldwide. The Communist Party of China and the government have been committed to combating and punishing corruption. With the rapid development of the internet, means of combating corruption advance with the times. Network anti-corruption which is different from traditional anti-corruption finds favour in eyes of the government and people and gradually becomes a powerful weapon in the anti-corruption movement. People supervise the government and object to corruption with the help of the network platform which fully displayed people’s exercise of rights of supervision. The network brings new support to people’s political participation. People’s active participation in politics can reduce occurrence of corruption effectively. We should recognize positive significance of network corruption. At the same time, we should also see problems existing in the new means of anti-corruption.This paper had three parts. In the first part, it started with concept definition and advantage introduction of “network anti-corruption”, stated democratic legitimacy of network anti-corruption from perspectives of the main body and aims of network anti-corruption. Network anti-corruption represented combination of networks, public opinions and governing capacity essentially. The network exploits the advantages to the full, absorb people’s opinions widely. At the same time, it can integrate people’s opinions and wisdom to promote the formation and the development of the democratic network environment. In addition, the idea of “popular sovereignty”, “principal-agent theory” and relevant regulations of domestic constitution provide support to democratic legitimacy of network anti-corruption together.Section two elaborates realistic conflicts of network anti-corruption, namely conflict between netizens’ freedom of speck and right reputation of civil servants; conflict between citizens’ right of supervision and privacy right of supervisees; conflict between network exploration and corruptive information process of netizens and investigation security of corruption cases; after corruption cases enter judicial process, conflict between netizens’ guidance of public opinion and judicial independence. These realistic confluences are also embodiment of existing problems in network anti-corruption.Section three discusses path conception of standardizing network anti-corruption, conducts function orientation on fork network anti-corruption before putting solutions. After defining main functions of starting anti-corruption, it puts forward system accommodation for conflicts of network anti-corruption from three aspects of standard level, system conception and government information open mechanism. Meanwhile, it constructs and perfects linkage working mechanism of official-netizen resultant force anti-corruption from four aspects of perfecting report mechanism, acceptance mechanism, information processing mechanism and public opinion guidance mechanism, and ultimately elaborates external communicative mechanism of judicial offices to ensure judicial independence.