Study On Governance Mode Transition Of NIMBY

Economic freedom and social consciousness is always accompanies. Reform and opening to the outside while brings the economic boom and social wealth, but also has given rise to the civil rights consciousness, participation awareness and consciousness. In the macro background between economic development and environmental protection, authoritarian regimes and civil society conflicts intertwined, appears the NIMBY phenomenon in urban governance. This not only caused impact to the normal social order, make the government fall into the predicament of the "governance failure", but also because the location and construction of public facilities difficult, and detrimental to the achievement of public interest.Based on the citizen in the process of urbanization for opposing adjacent facilities built in the "backyard" avoidance of conflict avoidance as the main research object. NIMBY conflict in our country as an emerging class of things, Because of its intersection with the environmental protection mass incidents, NIMBY conflict in our country as an emerging class of things, because of the environmentally friendly group events intersect, it is often treated as a kind of mass incidents. Through Analysis of NIMBY conflicts with the environmental protection concept of group events, make adjacent to avoid conflict from the mass incidents sociological study of narrative,but from the perspective of public policy in order to avoid the occurrence of NIMBY conflicts. The reason of NIMBY both has direct cause and the nature cause:NIMBY facilities due to negative externalities will cause potential harm to the citizens of the reality of fear and injustice based on NIMBY episodes perception, and institutional enclosed public decision-making process, and the lack of internal oversight mechanisms blocking channels for expressing interest is the direct cause of conflict; The reason lies in the nature of the distribution of benefits NIMBY policy imbalance structure of public facilities, NIMBY facilities that produce public benefits are shared by the general public, and its possible negative externalities is borne entirely by the facilities nearby community. Only by grasping the essence of the conflict NIMBY incentive to come up with strategies for effective governance NIMBY conflict.The arrival of the traditional risk society embattled closed decision-making model, had to turn to negotiation of pluralistic participatory governance. The essential nature of public administration also requires full realization of civil environmental justice. Based on the above two aspects, from the regression of democratic administration theory of "social justice" and to promote "citizen participation" Two aspects of the conflict to avoid the NIMBY clear direction. On the one hand, based on the "selective incentives" principle, give NIMBY community economic damage-mental-health complex environmental feedback measures to increase the cost of the public to enjoy benefits, efforts to achieve each community revenue sharing obligations shared equally. On the other hand, created a complete system of participatory tools, chain stretched public participation, the public to participate in the project NIMBY facilities, program development, all aspects of project implementation and policy evaluation. Under the concept of democratic governance, innovates policy instruments to balance the demands of diverse interests and avoide NIMBY conflicts, which is meaningful for enchancing the governance ability of government.In recent years, from the typical path of governance NIMBY conflict cases, the. government often uses the administrative control of the decision-making mode, advance closure decision, a matter of policy to sell afterwards cease to quickly extinguished by the fire of the masses, this stop-gap measures effective management and disposal of passive coping strategies to treat the foot of the conflict can not be achieved NIMBY, NIMBY but exacerbated the conflict escalation, more prominent citizen participation in decision-making model under control and system supply the demands of legitimate public policy contradictions and shortcomings of decline. Therefore, we need to start the transformation of the original decision-making model, then turned to where? This is a question to be answered in this article.