The Urban Community Residents Democratic Ability Existence Question And Countermeasure Research

Its history dates back more than thirty years of China’s reform and openingup has entered a "thirtysomething," the context of China’s political reform is alsomore clearly, gradually focusing on democracy, especially grassroots democracyis also a hot issue Chinese Democracy Studies one. In this paper, our urbancommunity as a research subject, they are subject, as microscopic buildingdemocracy in China has long been known as the hat is not democratic. Into thecontemporary, the pace of China under the auspices of the democratic process inthe country is slow, the other hand can be found in the course of China’sdemocratic development, democracy and the ability of residents being repressedand ignored. Residents of democracy is not high to become an important factorin the development of grassroots democracy. The ability to interpret theresidents of democracy, democracy can seek to improve residents. This paper focuses on three aspects of urban community of democraticability to study, including: the main skills, the ability to participate in practice,supervision and management capabilities. Taiyuan, Shanxi Wanbailin Du Pingstreet children each community as a carrier-depth research, the ability tounderstand the status quo of the residents of democracy, and analyzed andsummarized the specific problems of its existence. Among them, the ability toexpress the main problem is: the level of economic development is uneven,varying level of education, the lack of institutionalized channels for expressinginterest and other ordinary community residents; the ability to participate inpractice there is a problem: weak sense of community residents to participate incommunity participation in the system is not perfect, there is a gender imbalancein the community of democratic participation in a serious lack ofcommunication phenomenon among community residents, young peopleinvolved in community affairs, such as the performance is not positive; capacityto supervise the problems are: residents’ awareness of weak oversight andsupervision will is not strong; community affairs, non-standard, residents do nottrust the disclosure; control environment is bleak, not smooth enough channelsof supervision, lack of oversight mechanisms operability. Residents democraticcapacity problems and socio-economic factors, residents democratic awareness,community acquaintances radius, governance philosophy, communitymanagement system and development of civil society and other factors areclosely related. After concrete democratic practice, the author summarizes the currentsituation of how to take measures to improve the ability of residents ofdemocracy. Community residents is the main city of grassroots democracy,when the object of restricting the development of democracy and democraticbody, the body’s democratic initiative will begin to play. For residents of thedemocratic capacity lag problem, community residents proper guidance andtraining, such as: increased awareness among residents of democracy, strengthenthe ability of residents of democracy democratic quality training, changingdemocratic expression. China is the dominant characteristic of communityautonomy and promoted by the government, which determines the stage ofcommunity development is inseparable from the government’s support and help.The local government should be guided by the interests of the residents ofexpression, builders. The state should support the development ofself-organization of residents and safeguard the interests expressed by theresidents to realize, through the expression of the government to guide residentsto participate, they are not to lose the ability to supervise the existing order andrules, in order to maintain harmony and stability in the urban community.Government and community residents in the promotion of democracy should bedone to support the ability of community autonomy, promotion of communitydemocracy, education and community residents, community supervision andguidance, innovation communities. Gradually increase the ability of residents ofdemocracy through these means, the cause of promoting the development of grassroots democracy. Of course, the needs of residents and communities toactively cooperate with the government in guiding and regulating the growingawareness of democracy in strengthening democratic capacity. Various efforts bygovernments, communities and residents, give full play to the main skills ofcommunity residents to participate in practical ability and capacity to supervise,is an effective way to break the current plight of the development of grassrootsdemocracy.