Study Of Government Responcibility On Rural Elderly Security

The most recent period, the aging of the population has become a global problem, and the aging of the "urban" inversion features make economic development more backward rural areas face greater pressure on pension. Past 60 years, China’s social security system in cities and towns has become increasingly perfect, but the responsibility of the government due to historical reasons the absence of such a social security system for rural development is seriously lagging behind, low level of farmers pension, pension demand can not be an effective response, which is government "fairness and justice" serious departure from the concept of governance. Therefore, from the perspective of government responsibility to explore the establishment and improvement of rural old-age security system, to solve the pension problem in rural areas and even the country, to build a harmonious and stable social environment for development, has important practical significance.Articles from the theoretical level, analyzes the theoretical basis of government participation in rural old-age security. The existence of market failure is the premise of government involvement in the rationalization of the social security system, social security as the nature of public goods, such that it also must be provided by the government have the ability to supply public goods. Development of the theory of citizenship, so that citizens pension become a legitimate public rights. Specifically, the Government Pension Reform responsibilities are mainly legal support, institutional supply, financial support, regulatory and other aspects of the organization. In this paper the historical analysis, comparative analysis and other methods in the study of rural old-age security system, reviewing the development of the rural old-age security since the founding, analyze the effectiveness of policy implementation and status of government responsibility, by comparing the major international pension model summarize experience in other countries in the rural old-age security, government responsibility in which to explore the roles and boundaries. Historical Investigation by longitudinal and transverse international comparison the government to improve the responsibility system in rural old-age security provides a reference value.Reform of the social security system internationally, though not exactly the same path to achieve, but the responsibility of the government to moderation, increasing with the government and other subjects, more social security has become a major feature of social trends and directions. On the status of rural old-age security of the visit, we found there are many problems of rural endowment:Family Support is still the main provider of the current rural old-age security, but exacerbate social transformation makes family pension overwhelmed; economic support of rural elderly poor, spirit status and poor health, especially senior citizens and elderly left behind, facing a more serious pension problem. Highlights the plight of rural endowment lack of government responsibility, which is China’s dual social structure, the central and local governments are not clear about the division of responsibilities. Although the article has been concerned about the issue of government responsibility in the rural old-age security, he stressed that the Government provides the basic pension should play a leading role, but the government responsibility is not static, dynamic government responsibility, regional characteristics.In the current national conditions, pension issues in rural China is complex and ambitious, if only rely on the government’s influence is difficult to obtain effective and positive response, therefore, the government should as a "coordinator" to integrate the pension resources in rural areas, give full play to the government, family, a variety of subject communities and other forces, build endowment support network composed of the three to establish a includes economic support, daily care, emotional comfort of more welfare security system. But the change of government responsibility is not equal to withdraw from the government responsibility in the family pension, pension community, Social Security (government guarantees), the government should play respectively advocates, supporters, leading role, take the initiative to assume responsibility for pension.