A Comparative Study In The Form Of The Mass Sports Management Of China And The United States

Sports in the modern social life plays a more and more important role, governments and the public sports to the attention of more and more. At present, China’s mass sports development has made great achievements, but there are still some defects. In order to improve the health level of the people, form a positive social climate and strengthening international competitiveness, China needs to draw lessons from the successful experience of foreign good national mass sports development and sports development. The United States is a sports power, mass sports development and the research level in the world leading level. The United States in the mass sports, there are many worthy of our using for reference the successful experience of, for the development of China’s current public sports have important reference value, especially in the aspect of management has its unique feature. In this paper, using the method of literature, comparative analysis method, such as China and the United States are compared from the macroscopic Angle of mass sports management form, trying to learn the successful experience of the American public sports management. In this paper, the conclusion is as follows:(1) the current China’s social sports management still take "the government’s leading" management model, state sport general administration and local government administrative department for physical culture and sports to guide social sports work, management, the government in the process the role of a "dominant" for funding resources control, specific policy formulation and implementation in the leading role. While in the case of China and the United States is completely different, the management of the social sports and guide the work shall be the responsibility of the sports community and other related organizations, government funding support for relevant institutions to carry out the social sports activities, no specific intervention in social sports management, social organizations of social sports has the larger independent management.(2) both governments of China and the United States attaches great importance to the development of mass sports. The difference is that the U.S. government in the process of management of mass sports, the devolution of power to state government, community, etc., to mobilize all available manpower and material resources and financial resources to meet the demand of mass sports; The core of Chinese mass sports managers is the government, the department in charge of sports of sports social organizations not value, don’t trust, don’t let go, do regardless of the state and community incorporation, tube phenomenon still exists.(3) both governments of China and the United States attaches great importance to promote the development of domestic public sports through legislation. U.S. policies in line with the objective reality, covers the health is the most important question, is the federal agencies, state and local government department of health, health concern; Determine target maneuverability strong, is to understand by the general public, and is closely related with the interests of everyone; And issued policy continuity, draw lessons from the past experience and; The content of China’s public sports policies is very general, the government at a higher level to develop a series of measures, the government at a lower level implementation effect is not obvious, and even many people have heard of the name of the regulations, only and do not know the aim and content, the lack of enforcement, strong operability regulations and plan, the national fitness legislation is difficult to meet the real demand.(4) by comparing the social functions of mass sports, the two countries is the American community sports clubs, social groups, social sports instructors in the United States plays an important role in the mass sports development, they are independent in the United States, with full autonomy, fully participate in American public sports affairs management, and a wide variety, the largest number of members, each club or social groups are equipped with a professional social sports instructors; In China, the community sports club mostly from belong to the government and social groups, it is hard to work independently, even in the community sports social organizations, also there are few scientific guidance in the professional social sports instructors. In recent years, although the number of China’s social sports instructor increase year by year, but have no post phenomenon serious.