Study On The Evaluation System Of Performance Of Housing Security In Beijing County

Beijing attracts a large influx of talent. There are many housing contradictions, in order to alleviate the difficult problem of housing in Beijing, the Beijing municipal government in recent years has been built around one million units of affordable housing. The security type diversification and scale expansion greatly improved the housing conditions of the city’s residents. However, as we vigorously promote housing security, some problems have also created in construction, qualification examination, the use of funds. These problems caused a widespread discussion in the society, people began to focus on how to assess the government-led housing security. Scientific and efficient housing security performance evaluation system is an effective means.According to "affordable housing construction and management guidance to the implementation of views"(Jing Zheng Ban Fa [2012] No.2) requirements, provincial government is responsible for housing security overall, county government is responsible for implementing housing security, covering all aspects of the construction of housing security, distribution, and management. Therefore, county government should be housing security performance evaluation objects. By studying the literature found, higher levels of government to lower levels of government is less a study of housing security assessment in aspects of job performance, there is a comprehensive housing job performance evaluation index system. And because Beijing housing security performance evaluation started late, evaluation form is small, key elements are uncertainty. The current lack of a scientific performance evaluation system evaluates county government.Establishment of a comprehensive, objective, substantial housing security performance evaluation system is a key design evaluation, clear scoring criteria and determine the index weight. Performance evaluation design is the core of the entire system. An objective, reasonable and complete housing security performance evaluation system will help improve the efficiency of the evaluation, but also determines whether it can objectively reflect the actual operation of the county’s housing security. Clear scoring criteria refers to quantitative performance indicators, is the basis for horizontal or vertical contrast county housing security work. Index weights reflect the importance of performance indicators, and a direct impact on the county housing security performance evaluation results.Therefore, in this article it is to make the county housing security performance evaluation based on evidence as the goal, housing security and performance evaluation theory as a guide, the county housing security duties as the basis. I combine actual work, determine the construction management, rental management, post management, financial security, information exchange five categories of housing security performance evaluation of a number of indicators and secondary indicators and third indicators, set Scoring criteria. Then I use the analytic hierarchy process; determine the index weight and Beijing affordable housing project performance evaluation form, Moreover, in order to promote more successful management performance evaluation of housing security, the reform system should be accelerated. This article will provide experience, when the National Audit Office evaluated the performance of provincial and municipal housing projects, at the same time paper as a reference, while other provincial governments assess the performance of lower levels of government housing security.