Research On Classified Management Of Cases In Basic Court

To administer a country in accordance with the law is our Party's strategy in ruling the country in China. Fair and efficient judicial adjudication has become more and more urgent for our country's courts. In Chinese court system, the overall trial performance is not high, especially in the basic level of the court's special status, the trial efficiency and social public expectations compared to the outstanding problems. Facing the increasing number of cases, many people have little contradiction. How to improve the efficiency of the trial in the existing personnel system is a difficult problem in the basic level court. Based the grassroots courts in the judicial practice and the current judicial reform policies, in D county court case type of trial management as the reference samples, using management related knowledge and theory research, close to the management practice of grassroots courts, to those factors and perspective and trial efficiency is closely related to the case classification management and allocation of judges. Discussion and case classification management related basic theory and the connotation of case classification management, characteristics and analysis courts at the grassroots level to achieve the value of case classification management, it also briefly introduces the current our country carries on the classification management of some cases to try and explore. The problems and reasons of the current basic level court cases management mode are analyzed. Less than the case, unreasonable cases distribution is uneven, the configuration of the judge, gaps in the judicial division of labor and the imbalance of the assessment and other factors seriously affected the trial of the case, the reason of these problems is due to the type of the grass-roots court judge structure of binary and cases. Trying to explore measures to improve the efficiency of the trial and reform measures, to seek the realization of the case classification management. In order to improve the efficiency of the trial to improve the efficiency of the trial and guidance, and ultimately to respond to public demands for fairness and justice, to meet the growing public demand for "fair and efficiency".