The Influence Of Revocation Of Sub-district Office On Autonomy Of Urban Community

The reform of urban grassroots governance is an important part of the reform of local government.With the reform of administrative system and the reform of social governance system in the process of gradual improvement,community governance has also entered the sight of researcher's and the local government's.The long-term highly centralized administrative system has brought the Committee administrative problems,how to make the neighborhood to the chief,restore the functions of autonomy,is an important issue in community governance.At the grassroots level of local government reform,and the reform of state organs should be relatively new mode,the local places are actively exploring governance,specific to the city grassroots governance reform,the "Shenyang model","Jianghan mode","Shanghai model","Qingdao model","Yantian model" several typical mode,there are some places to try grid management reform,several models have achieved success,but they are failed to change the government too much and administrative efficiency is low.In recent years,in the transformation of government functions under the background of reform in many city streets of the office of revocation of the country,as a reduction to Low levels of government,improve service efficiency,promote the reform of community autonomy,its impact on the community autonomy in relation to the effectiveness of the reform,through several pilot city of revoked district offices in Tongling,Anhui,Hubei,Huangshi,Guizhou,Guiyang field research,understand the revocation of the sub-district office reform background,measures and results,by visiting the area government workers,community workers and ordinary residents,using questionnaires and interviews and other forms,exploring different groups for the revocation of street office views,in order to change the panoramic display of street community autonomy to withdraw the reform brought by the analysis of the achievements and shortcomings.Through the investigation,we found that the revocation of street office reform to reduce the administrative level,brought some changes in the administrative system,the urban community governance also has a certain impact,the main sense of community residents have awakened,community social organizations have developed,But there are some shortcomings,such as low level of participation of residents,participation is not high,the development of community social organizations are in the embryonic stage,and not enough ability to participate in community governance and the provision of public services,although the government to develop various policies to try to Reduce the burden of neighborhood committees,but little effect,the neighborhood still have to bear the heavy administrativework,for the problems in community governance,by analyzing the reasons,we put forward some suggestions,first of all,should be clear from the system community neighborhood community autonomy In order to ensure that the government provides public services,convenience services can be better completed,without prejudice to the autonomy of the neighborhood function,we recommend the establishment of administrative in the community(in order to ensure the government's administrative services,Station or administrative affairs agency and other agencies responsible for administrative affairs,while the establishment of a scientific community and government interaction mechanism to change the existing similar subordinate relationship between the interactive model,so that the neighborhood is no longer the government "legs";To change the ideas and ideas,that is,the Government no longer do all-around government,the community to the residents to governance,the neighborhood can not do all-around nannystyle neighborhood,but to create conditions for residents to organize themselves,self-management and self-Should take various measures to promote the development of community social organizations to promote the development of residents from the organization,the real "community is the residents";again to enliven the community resources,mining community potential,community units,community party organizations are launched And finally participate in community governance;the last is to explore new community governance techniques,the use of new technologies to mobilize residents,organize residents,so that residents really exercise the power of community autonomy.