The Effect Of Peer Acceptance Type On Children's Fair Distribution Behavior And Fair Cognition

Fair cognition is an important part of children's moral development,which is closely related to the social development of children.Children's fair distribution behavior is one of the specific embodiment of the pro-social behavior,as well as an important part of children's moral development.Many studies have found that an equitable distribution of children's behavior affected by many factors.In addition to the cognitive process of individual,but also involves the development level,such as individual psychological theory resources quantity,emotional experience and distributor and distribution of the object of social relations,and other complex factors.Expect the common factors,perhaps the influence factors of some new temporarily not be reviewed.In studies of children's peer acceptance,Chinese scholars Zou Hong pointed out:Peer acceptance is a kind of group to one-way structure,reflects the group's attitude to the individual:like or dislike,to accept or reject.Children's peer acceptance and social cognition,has a close relationship between prosocial behavior.Studies have confirmed that the higher the peer acceptance of children,the social cognitive level and pro-social behavior level is relatively high.Fair cognition is a kind of social cognition,and fair distribution behavior belongs to a kind of important pro-social behavior,so fair distribution behavior and peer acceptance and children fair whether there are certain relations between cognition,there is no research to confirm so far.A large number of research at the earliest of fair recognition of children is Piaget that his story interviewing method is fair and cognition of the classic methods for children,Kohlberg based on absorption of piaget's research,which adopting the moral dilemma story method to study the moral development of children.Then Damon adopted the actual rewards allocation problems to study the development of children's reward allocation fairness cognition.The story interviewing method of Piaget is too simple and subjective,but it is the earliest study of children's concept of justice of the paradigm.The story method is used to actually is also a kind of projection measurements which to gain a lot of important and universal significance later investigation is the results of the study.While in the study of resource allocation behavior in children,the scholars use the research paradigm in the field of economics to study the trend of the development of the resource allocation behavior,equity sensitivity,injustice,disgust,etc,and the dictator game paradigm mainly has the ultimatum game.Wu Yan pointed out that in the ultimatum game,proposed generosity allocation behavior might just to avoid being reflected to and cause damage to their own interests of a kind of strategic behavior,so as to clarify the confusion,researchers have introduced the dictator game which can more effectively pure research individual fairness and altruism.And under two kinds of game model,the results are compared.So this article will use the piaget story interview method and two kinds of game paradigm respectively on different kinds of peer acceptance of children for fair distribution justice perception and behavior research.This study selected 125 children aged 7-9 years in primary school as the research object,according to Piagets' stories interviewing method and two classical game theory paradigm,respectively to investigate children's cognitive fair and equitable distribution behavior.Understanding the different types of peer acceptance of children fair distribution justice perception and behavior whether there is a difference,children's cognitive and fair distribution behavior is consistent.Research one and Research two is respectively adopted the ultimatum paradigm and dictators paradigm to examine an equitable distribution of different types of peer acceptance of children behavior.Research three based on adapted questionnaire to interview children about fair cognitive.Research analysis of the obtained data by SPSS 16.0 in specific data processing,respectively,using the description statistics,single factor analysis of variance,non-parametric test.Based on the conditions of this study,the following conclusions:1.Under the ultimatum paradigm,an equitable distribution of children's behavior is not influenced by peer acceptance type,each child can make a fair distribution more ground behavior.While under the dictator paradigm,popular and neglected children and normal group were better than rejected children showed a more equitable distribution behavior,being rejected childrens show lowest fair distribution behavior level.2.The fair cognition of children on the whole is not affected by peer acceptance type,the vast majority of children believe that fairness is equality.3.Under the ultimatum paradigm,an equitable distribution of various types of children's behavior and fair cognitive consistency is higher,are not affected by peer acceptance type,and the fair distribution of behavior under the dictator's paradigm and fair cognitive deviation,various types of children's cognitive fair there was no significant difference,but distribution behavior was different.