Comparative Analysis Of Synonymous Single And Double Corresponding Conjunctions "Yin"(?) And "Yinwei"(??)

There are no two identical words in the modern Chinese system.Even the monosyllabic and homonymous counterparts are different.Therefore,this article chooses a group of single and double corresponding conjunctions"yin"(?)and"yinwei"(??)to explore.From the three aspects of style,syntax and pragmatics,demonstrate the connection and difference between the two and explain their causes.In terms of stylistics,the article uses corpora to conduct statistics on the basis of stylistic grammar,and finds that the monosyllable conjunction"yin"(?)is mostly distributed in the book style,while the disyllabic conjunction"yinwei"(??)is in the book style and daily conversation Large numbers of.And through the investigation of the narrative angle and the combination ability of classical Chinese words,it is concluded that"yin"(?)is more suitable for the style of formality and elegance than"yinwei"(??);in terms of syntax,the article examines the characteristics of similar words and combined words,and finds that"There is a prosodic relationship between"yin"(?)and"yinwei"(??)that"monosyllabic conjunctions are mostly combined with monosyllabic words,and bisyllabic conjunctions are often combined with disyllabic words".At the same time,it was also found that in the sentences connected by the conjunctions,the duration of the adverb modification affects the connection ability of"yin"(?)and"yinwei"(??).When the polar time adverb appears in the connection event,the connection function of"yin"(?)will be invalid;pragmatically,it will start from the two aspects of discourse focus,coherence and thoroughness.The causal sentences led by the disyllabic conjunction"yinwei"(??)have the function of focus preposition,while the monosyllabic conjunction"yin"(?)can only follow the traditional word order and put the focus behind.Furthermore,it is also found that"yinwei"(??)has the ability to connect causality across sentences and undertake discourse,thus deducing that its coherence is stronger than"yin"(?).And because"yinwei"(??)can be connected with loose complex sentences,it is weaker than"yin"(?)in terms of thoroughness.The innovation of this article is reflected in the following aspects:First,there is very little research on single and double corresponding function words.The article is original in the study of function words under the framework of past real word research.Second,this article is based on a large number of corpus statistics and text analysis.The difference between the single and double corresponding conjunctions"yin"(?)and"yinwei"(??)provides tangible data support;Third,this paper demonstrates the semantic appraisal tendency of the single and double corresponding conjunctions"yin"(?)and"yinwei"(??)in the specific sentence pattern of"yin(?)VP..."from the perspective of the semantic appraisal tendency,which provides new research for both.Perspective.The structure of the article is divided into five parts.The first chapter briefly summarizes the research object of this article,the current situation and shortcomings of the study of grammar and single and double corresponding conjunctions,the purpose and methods of research,and the source of corpus.Chapters two,three,and four discuss the difference between the single and double corresponding conjunctions"yin"(?)and"yinwei"(??)in terms of style,syntax,and pragmatics.Chapter five summarizes the main points of the previous article,and lists the innovations and deficiencies of the article.