| With the development of technology and popular of network,"manpower search"engine emerged."Manpower search" engine started with the "Chen Ziyao Event" and reach a climax with the occurrence of the "cruel cat" incident in 2006 and the "Qian Jun Hitting Event",the "South China tiger Event" in 2007.What's more,the emergence of "Death Blog Event" directly put "human-powered search" engine forward into the judicial field.And manpower search has become the main way to acquire and communicate information of people.Also,it has become the main power to influence the opinion of mainstream media.As a new mode of search engine,"manpower search" engine,it speeds up the transmission of information,strengthens the supervision of public opinion and advocates the main theme of social solidarity and cooperation.So people honored "manpower search"engine the protector of justice.But,what exists in "manpower search" engine is the collection and publication of other people's privacy without masters' permission.This private behavior greatly threat the privacy of internet users.And also,because of the prevalence of the phenomenon that "manpower search" engine often infringe people's privacy,people only can not help but reflect",this is a time without privacy".In recent years,cases caused by "manpower search" engine occur frequently and legal experts pay much attention on this phenomenon.Then with the publication of Tort Law the 36th article,the research on "manpower search" engine become a hot spot.And "manpower search" engine,which exists in legal limbo longtime,includes many questions.For example,what's the specific definition of "manpower search"engine?Whether the existence of "manpower search" engine is reasonable?And what's more severe question caused by "manpower search" engine is how to protect people's cyber privacy.Because in current days,the fast development of technology make people have more ways to collect others' private information,net users will often fall in the upset that his privacy will be stole when he is surfing the internet and his privacy won't be protected.What's more,most net user don't know how to seek remedy when his privacy suffered other's invasion.But what's a pity,the decrees in effect in our country completely can't solve these problems.And what's more,the deficiency and unclear of legislation often lead to the result that the cases about"manpower search" engine haven't legislative basis and the verdicts can't be approved by the public.Further,what triggered by this dilemma is net users use keyboard as their weapon to protect instead of law and morality is regard as the only trial standard instead of law.Above all,the strengthen of cyber privacy's protection should be a matter of great urgency.However,what we should point out is that the traditional protected mode of classic privacy has already can't solve the diverse torts now.So we should use another means to protect the privacy in the internet environment.That's build a protect system for cyber privacy especially.No doubt that as the equivalent in internet of privacy,cyber privacy has enormous influence.And nowdays,the frequent occurrence of the cases involve the privacy torts made Professor Roomkin can't help but sign,"privacy has already died".Thus the protection of cyber privacy is imperative.Only build a completely strict protected system of cyber privacy can we defend "people's dignity" in the network era.The text of this paper has four parts,mainly introduce some knowledge of "man power" engine and the protection of cyber privacy.The first part presents some basic theories about "man power" engine,includes the origination and development of "man power" engine,the definition of "man power" engine and the social effect of "man power" engine.The second part starts with the analysis of the difference between traditional privacy and cyber privacy,and then through the analysis the author give a detailed introduction of the definition and competence of cyber privacy.The third part put point on some cases to show where cyber internet torts roots in and the author lists two representative behavior pattern of cyber internet torts.At the same time,the author also explains if internet service providers should pay for privacy torts and analyzes how to take responsibility is reasonable to them.In the last part,the author continues her paper mainly from two aspects---the market solution and the legal regulation.This part begins with a brief introduction of protected mode of cyber privacy in America and China and then the author puts forward the weakness exists in our country's cyber privacy protected system.And at last,the author give some self advice on how to found a solid protected system of cyber privacy and points out in order to achieve this target the most important is we should pay the same attention on the market solution and the legal regulation. |
PDF Full Text Request