Font Size: a A A

Status Quo,Causes And Countermeasures Of Fisheries Disputes Between China And Korea

Posted on:2019-06-19Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Q R XuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2416330545963500Subject:International politics
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In 2000,in order to adapt to the new international fishery order established by the international community,following the basic principles of the "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea" and realizing the corresponding transformation of China's traditional fishery management system,China and South Korea signed a bilateral agreement between China and South Korea,namely the "China-Korea Fisheries Agreement".The "Agreement" first made provisional arrangements on fisheries issues.Despite China's government taking various measures in fisheries,the "China-Korea Fisheries Agreement" has caused a considerable negative impact on Chinese fisheries.The violent conflicts triggered by the disputes over fisheries between China and South Korea began to appear in the media.The second chapter begins with the background and content of the Sino-Korea Fisheries Agreement,analyzes the implementation of the Agreement,and focuses on the analysis of the mutual fishing status of China and South Korea in the waters managed by the exclusive economic zone.A summary of the current state of fishery disputes between China and South Korea from 2001 to 2018,that is,from the very beginning of the non-implementation of the "Agreement" to the status of almost zero,to disputes gradually step by step highlights,and then to 12.12 events in 2011 broke out completely It has not been suspended until now.In the third chapter,due to continuous disputes,China' s fishery production has been hit,and the peoples of China and South Korea have been emotionally antagonistic.This has also affected Sino-Korea relations.The specific analysis of the "negotiable" from the fishermen to the enterprise,from the individual to the entire domestic fishery economy has a negative impact that can not be ignored.The fourth chapter analyzes the reasons for the negative impact of the "Agreement".The "Agreement" was only initially used as a temporary policy.Its purpose was to maintain the common fishery resources of China and South Korea and was not a demarcation of sea areas.However,after its implementation,South Korea has managed to manage the sea area of the exclusive economic zone based on the demarcation of the sea area.This approach is related to South Korea' s marine strategy,but the fundamental analysis is due to the instability of Sino-Korean political relations.The trend of the dispute can be seen to some extent in the Sino-Korea intimate trend.The dependence of South Korea' s maritime strategy and its own selectivity to the“UN Convention on the Law of the Sea" have made fisheries disputes not only a small issue,but also its dependence makes it necessary to prioritize the interests of the United States.The selectivity of the "Convention" makes it not recognize the provisions that are unfavorable to itself.Therefore,the issue of fishery disputes is more like a sign of structural in harmoniousness between China and South Korea.The relations between the two countries affect disputes,and the disputes are under the command of political opinion and will affect the relations between the two countries.This is a process that affects each other.The fifth chapter mainly gives some policy suggestions on the negative impact of the "Agreement".The "Agreement" is,on the surface,the "equal division" of the exclusive economic zone between the two countries that is fair to each other.In fact,it has indeed not considered an"inequality" agreement for the fishermen's own fishing interests.Whether it is the lack of traditional fishing grounds or the continuous decrease in the scale of fishery when China enters the fishing industry every year,it is actually an unfair arrangement for China.However,after the implementation of the "Convention",the exclusive economic zone system has been recognized by the international community.Therefore,we can only find ways to resolve disputes based on the "Convention".South Korea's fishery development is in the same ecological system in China,and many references to our country,whether it is the TAC system or the development of marine animal husbandry,are of great help to the current fishery development in China.While drawing lessons from other countries'experiences in fishery development,in the face of such a severe situation in fishery development,we must also adjust our fishery industrial structure as soon as possible to promote the transformation of fisheries.Finally,through analysis,the following conclusions have been drawn:First,if we want to solve the fishery dispute,we must adjust it from the source,which is the main body of the incident;Second,the most important measure to resolve the dispute is to ensure the long-term and stable development of Sino-Korean relations.Third,the most practical and feasible way to solve fishery disputes at present is to accelerate China's own fishery transformation...
Keywords/Search Tags:Fishery disputes, ?China-ROK Fisheries Agreement?, EEZ, Mutual fishing, Marine Strategy
PDF Full Text Request
Related items